Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

8 2 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 09 2017

Plastiblends India Limited Through Its Chairman and Managing Director ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-09-2017

in these appeals pertains to claim of depreciation under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax 3 Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to … Chapter IV of the Act which is regulated by Sections 28 to 43D of the Act. Section 32 deals with depreciation


Dec 19 2008

Plastiblends India Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Ac ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-19-2008

Reported in: (2009)223CTR(Bom)291; [2009]178TAXMAN397(Bom)

the total income for the purposes of deduction Under Section 80HH?Factual Panorama:3. The Appellant is a Company incorporated under the Companies … of the Assessee, the present Appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the


Oct 16 2009

Plastiblends India Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-16-2009

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR4592; (2009)227CTR(Bom)1; [2009]318ITR352(Bom); 2010(1)MhLj526; [2009]185TAXMAN187(Bom)

total income, on which 100% deduction was claimed under Section 80IA of the Act.6. The above return of income was processed … J.P. Devadhar, J.1. This appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`Act' for short) was


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 31 2014

Palmtrade Services P. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(2)(4 ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-31-2014

(A) failed to appreciate that on proper computation under Rule 8D the disallowance would be only Rs.1,797/-. 2.1. The Ld CIT


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial