8 1 - Judgment Search Results
Chunilal and Co. (Tm) (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito, Ward 8(1)(2), Mumbai
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-29-2005
Reported in: (2005)4SOT309(Mum.)
This is an appeal filed by the assessee and is directed against the order dated 19-7-2005 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment year 2001-02.The main grievance raised in this appeal is that
Amber Tie Up Limited Vs. Income Tax officer, Ward 8(1) and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2017
AMBER TIE- UP LIMITED Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD81) & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 16th January, 2017. MRS.Manju Agarwal, Mr.Bajrang Manot, Adversus …for the petitioner Md.Nizamuddhin, Adv.…for the respondent The Court : The
Aventis Pharma Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 8 (1), Mu ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-17-2014
(DEPB) benefit under the Export and Import Policy of India and also the benefit of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act; (b) On 30th November, 1998, the Petitioner filed its Return of Income for the A. … M.S. Sanklecha, J. 1. Both these two Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge:â (a) Notices dated 2nd February,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Caylx Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Dcit Range 8(1), Ltd. Vs. Pa No.Aa ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
16 Mumbai [the CIT (A)1 erred in confirming the disallowance made by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Range 8 (1), Mumbai (the AO) of Rs. 12,37,420/- on account Depreciation on building purchased from firm. 2. On the facts … 16 Mumbai [the CIT (A)1 erred in confirming the disallowance made by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Range 8 (1), Mumbai (the AO) of Rs.9,69,894 on account Depreciation on building purchased from firm. 2. On the facts and
A.P.L. (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the D.C.i.T., Range 8(1)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-28-2004
Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(Mum.)187
in similar facts and circumstances. The view adopted by the Tribunal in the above case for the AY 87-88 was followed by other Benches of the Tribunal vide their orders as under: i. Order dated 19.12.2001 in … which is a fully owned company of Neptune Orient Lines Ltd. (NOL). The assessee company was incorporated on 13.11.92 and commenced business on 7.12.92 in the name of India Trident Maritime (India) Pvt. Ltd. with share holding
Cybertech Systems and Software Ltd. Vs. Assistant Cit, Range 8(1)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-30-2005
Reported in: (2006)7SOT230(Mum.)
assessee's claim for deduction under section 10B of the Act and alternatively the claim for deduction under section 80 HHE of the Act. The facts relevant to these disputes are that the assessee is a domestic company … assessment year 2000-01.The first ground in the assessee's appeal questions the validity of the assessment framed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. We have heard both the sides and have carefully gone through the records.
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free