Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

8 1 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 29 2005

Chunilal and Co. (Tm) (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito, Ward 8(1)(2), Mumbai

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-29-2005

Reported in: (2005)4SOT309(Mum.)

This is an appeal filed by the assessee and is directed against the order dated 19-7-2005 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment year 2001-02.The main grievance raised in this appeal is that


Jan 16 2017

Amber Tie Up Limited Vs. Income Tax officer, Ward 8(1) and Ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-16-2017

AMBER TIE- UP LIMITED Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD81) & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 16th January, 2017. MRS.Manju Agarwal, Mr.Bajrang Manot, Adversus …for the petitioner Md.Nizamuddhin, Adv.…for the respondent The Court : The


Sep 17 2014

Aventis Pharma Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 8 (1), Mu ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-17-2014

(DEPB) benefit under the Export and Import Policy of India and also the benefit of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act; (b) On 30th November, 1998, the Petitioner filed its Return of Income for the A. … M.S. Sanklecha, J. 1. Both these two Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge:— (a) Notices dated 2nd February,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2013

Caylx Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Dcit Range 8(1), Ltd. Vs. Pa No.Aa ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-08-2013

16 Mumbai [the CIT (A)1 erred in confirming the disallowance made by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Range 8 (1), Mumbai (the AO) of Rs. 12,37,420/- on account Depreciation on building purchased from firm. 2. On the facts … 16 Mumbai [the CIT (A)1 erred in confirming the disallowance made by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Range 8 (1), Mumbai (the AO) of Rs.9,69,894 on account Depreciation on building purchased from firm. 2. On the facts and


Oct 28 2004

A.P.L. (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the D.C.i.T., Range 8(1)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-28-2004

Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(Mum.)187

in similar facts and circumstances. The view adopted by the Tribunal in the above case for the AY 87-88 was followed by other Benches of the Tribunal vide their orders as under: i. Order dated 19.12.2001 in … which is a fully owned company of Neptune Orient Lines Ltd. (NOL). The assessee company was incorporated on 13.11.92 and commenced business on 7.12.92 in the name of India Trident Maritime (India) Pvt. Ltd. with share holding


Nov 30 2005

Cybertech Systems and Software Ltd. Vs. Assistant Cit, Range 8(1)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-30-2005

Reported in: (2006)7SOT230(Mum.)

assessee's claim for deduction under section 10B of the Act and alternatively the claim for deduction under section 80 HHE of the Act. The facts relevant to these disputes are that the assessee is a domestic company … assessment year 2000-01.The first ground in the assessee's appeal questions the validity of the assessment framed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. We have heard both the sides and have carefully gone through the records.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial