Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

7 A - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2026

7 Eleven Inc ( A Delaware Limited Liability Company) Vs The Deputy Reg ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-11-2026

Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Building, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai-32. 3.Ravi Foods Private Limited, 7-4-112/1, Madhuban Colony Road, Kattedan, Hyderabad-500077.(R3 substituted vide order of court dated 31.7.2025 made in CMP(TM).Nos. 1 & 2


Mar 08 2022

Jayaprakasan and 7 Others vs Charaparambil Sakkena and Another

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-08-2022

39 YERS, S/O.GOPALAN MASTER, "PUTHANKALATHIL",THALAKKULATHUR P.O, THALAKKULATHUR,KOZHIKODE TALUK. 6 MEERA, AGED 56 YEARS, D/O.GOPALAN MASTER, "KALATHINKAL HOUSE",PERUVATHUR P.O,KOYILANDY. 7 REETHA,AGED 46 YEARS, D/O.GOPALAN MASTER, "KAKKADATH ITHAM VEETTIL", FEROKE P.O, CHERUVANNUR,KOZHIKODE TALUK. 8 GIRIJA, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O.GOPALAN


Jan 28 2020

Group 7 Guards (India) Pvt Ltd vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-28-2020

VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 8TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.26512 OF 2019(L) PETITIONER: GROUP 7 GUARDS (INDIA) PVT LTD CC-32/426, NEAR PALLISSERY JUNCTION, PALLISSERY ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN, KERALA - 682 025, REPRESENTED BY


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2006

Executive Engineer, Vii Construction Division, U.P. Jal Nigam, Vs. Pre ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-08-2006

Reported in: (2006)IILLJ1076All

him in log book when the workman came on the next day on 6.12.1980 between 6.00 a.m. to 7.00 a.m. he hurled abuses on Sri Raj Kumar after seeing the endorsement on the log book and threatened


Mar 21 2011

24 X 7 Learning Private Limited. Vs. ZaIn Family Trust a Private Trust ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-21-2011

1. The plaintiff in O.S. 7/2009 has come up in this appeal challenging the order dated 03.10.2009, passed on l.A. 1 filed, under Order


Nov 16 2012

“7. We Do Not Find Any Force in the Arguments Raised by the Vs. Fina ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-16-2012

CWP No.6344 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6344 of 1994 Date of decision:16.11.2012 Birender Singh .....Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner & others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.Kushagra...


May 22 2013

“7. Keeping in View Ratio Decidendi of Abovesaid Rulings and in a Gi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-22-2013

CRM not M-17137 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-17137 of 2013 Date of Decision:22.05.2013 Joga Singh .....Petitioner Versus Bhupinder Kaur and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER...


Sep 10 2013

“7. We Have Heard the Appellant (Writ Petitioner) in Person and Lear ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-10-2013

Gulati 2013.09.13 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.4223 of 2008 & 7 CWP No.15403 of 2008 courts will interfere only if they find all or any of the following: (i)


Feb 24 2014

“7. from 07.06.2011 to 14.09.2011 as Many as 25 Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-24-2014

S201403.03 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM M- 6637 of 2014 7 however, must be given to the other party. The power conferred by Section 311, CrPC, must, therefore, be


Apr 01 2014

(Annexure P-7) Issued Under Sections 4 and 6 the Land Vs. Moti Ram and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-01-2014

3 is needed at this stage. The prayer in this writ petition is to quash the notification dated 7.7.2011 (Annexure P-2) and 06.07.2012 Kumar Mohinder 2014.04.03 14:47 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial