7 1 - Judgment Search Results

Delhi Furniture Company Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1 ...

Court: Delhi

Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSCCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR ORDER % 23.04.2026 1. The petitioner has approached this Court with rather unusual facts and unique grievances. 2. The petitioner received a … $~155 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 747/2025 CM APPL. 3738/2025 DELHI FURNITURE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nischay Kantoor, Ms. Vandana Kothari and Mr. Sparsh

Despecto Realtors India Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1 ...

Court: Delhi

1179/2026 & CM APPL. 5762/2026 DESPECTO REALTORS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sapra, Adv.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 7(1) DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC, Mr. Sanjeev Menon and Mr. Rahul Singh, JSCs

Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court: Delhi

ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amol Sinha, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Rahul Kochar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.4-UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

M/s. IVRCL-KBL (JV) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7 ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

be consistent with the provisions of the Act. (State of U.P. vs. Babu Ram Upadhya (AIR 1961 SC 751). A statutory rule cannot enlarge or restrict the meaning of a Section. If a rule goes beyond, or … they had claimed refund of Rs.23,39,240/-; their case was selected for scrutiny, and subsequently a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act ?) was issued and served on the assessee;

Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle ...

Court: Delhi

In view of this the deduction of 4,67,89,966/- has been erroneously claimed by the assessee for A Y200708.” 7. The Assessee filed its objections and contended that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was barred … Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The... Petitioner seeks quashing of a notice dated 25th March, 2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by which the Deputy Commissioner of

Ashoka Marketing Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2002)3CALLT495(HC)

Amitava Lala, J. 1. This writ petition is made by the pen of one of the Directors of the petitioner company. From … objection. The hearing of assessment was completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act on 7th April, 1979. On 9th April, 1979 the petitioner challenged the order as well as the proceeding. One of

Manne Srinivasa Rao So Anjaiah, Aged 29 Vs. Regalla Uma, Wo. Satyanara ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Tribunal ought not to have dismissed the claim-petition doubting involvement of the car bearing No.GJ-2K-6632 in the accident. 7. As against the evidence of PW-1, there is evidence of official of the Insurance Company, who was examined