6 3 - Judgment Search Results

M.K. Tirupathi Rao Vs. The Deputy General Manager, Syndicate Bank, Ind ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

with an endorsement absentthough the postal peon made sincere attempts to serve letters on the petitioner waiting for 6 days and some of the letters were sent to the address of the petitioner at Nandigama, Krishna District … scheme of B.P.S. and that termination of services of the petitioner is against Articles 14, 16, 21 and 311 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, the order is liable to be quashed. The petitioner further contended

Khandelwal Laboratories (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-ta ...

Court: Mumbai

Rs.34,265/- to the credit of its account with State Bank of India was also withdrawn by the Revenue. 6. The Scheme of the Act provides that on passing of an assessment order under Section 143(3) of the

Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. Vs. Allahiri, Income-tax Officer, Compani ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1983]141ITR239(Bom)

Finance Bill received assent. It incorporated the relief to newspapers.6. On January 24, 1977, the CIT, Bombay City VI, addressed to the petitioners a notice under s. 263 of the Act. The notice stated that the ITO's … the purposes of the I.T. Act, 1961, was the period of 12 months ending on the preceding December 31. On February 15, 1976, the petitioners wrote to the Commissioner of Income-tax, with copes to the IAC and

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Formerly Glaxo India Ltd.) and ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

can be allowed. Therefore, the order of the CIT (A) is confirmed and the ground is accordingly rejected. 6. Ground No.4 is as under: "4. The CIT (A) erred in upholding the stand of the JCIT of … chart indicating the issues which are covered by earlier orders. These are considered while disposing of these appeals. 3. Ground No.1 raised by assessee is as under: "The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXVI Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Vs. Asst. Cit, Circle 6(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

a reasonable manner both qua direct as well as indirect expenditure, giving his definite findings. We decide accordingly. 6. In the result, the assessee's appeal is partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's … Revenue, arising out of the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Mumbai ('CIT(A)' for short) dated 30.11.2010, partly allowing the assessee's appeal contesting its assessment u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter)

Peninsula Land Limited (Earlier Known as Morarjee Realities Ltd.,) a C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)217CTR(Bom)616; [2008]307ITR183(Bom)

revised return on 2nd February 1995 in which it declared a total loss of Rs. 58,50,232 and Rs. 68,05,671 respectively. Respondent No. 2 passed an assessment order dated 27th December 1995 under Section 143(3) of the Act