6 2 - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Gupta Automobiles, Chennai Vs. Business Ward Vi(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

agreement dated 13.05.2008 was clarified to be the receipt for advance of money for vacating the tenanted premises. 6. The CIT(Appeals) failed to appreciate that having obtained necessary clarification on the factual aspects from the stake/property holder, … Dr. O.K. Narayanan, Vice President 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee. The relevant assessment year is 2009-2010. The appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IX, Chennai passed on 31.10.2012.

Date of Decision: 6.2.2013 Vs. Smt. Urmil Gupta Etc

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of the fact that the petitioner has been tenant in the demised premises for the last more than 60 yeaRs.he prays for one year's time to make alternative arrangement. Upon notice, Sh. Ankit Goel, Advocate has put … C.R.No.2675 of 2012 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2675 of 2012(O&M) Date

Date of Decision: 6.2.2013 Vs. Ramesh Mittal

Court: Punjab and Haryana

T.A.No.451 of 2012 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.451 of 2012 Date

a Copy of the Orders Dated 6.2.2014 and Today Be Sent to the Vs. Unkno ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

formed the basis of the petition. We had taken note of this fact while considering the matter on 6.2.2014, pointing out that one Dr. Rajinder Kumar Singla and Dr. R.D.Anand had been filing various petitions challenging the

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle ...

Court: Mumbai

the Constitution of India, the petitioner questions the assumption of jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Income Tax [Circle 6(2)], Mumbai under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act")

Hitech Outsourcing Services Vs. Income-tax Officer-Ward 6 (2)

Court: Gujarat

or not and if yes on what condition. In absence of any reasons, the order cannot be sustained. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order dated 28.07.2014 (Annexure-C) and the subsequent order dated 25.08.2014 (Annexure-D) … notice. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for both the sides, the matter is finally heard. 2. The only question arise for consideration in the present matter is "Whether the order below the stay application

Raghuram Grah Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Chandra Mohan S ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2006)201CTR(All)268; [2006]281ITR147(All)

in the aforesaid Bank were attached under the impugned order dated 22.12.2004, passed by the Income Tax Officer- 6 (2) Kanpur, which is Annexure-7 to the writ petition.2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present petition … 28430 as also the DCR account No. 7538 to 7541. On the same very day the Income Tax Officer-6 (2) Kanpur passed the order dated 22nd December, 2004, exercising the powers conferred on him by virtue of Section

Nusli Neville Wadia Vs. T.L. Nilkanthan, Wealth-tax Officer, Companies ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)39CTR(Bom)145; [1985]154ITR447(Bom); [1984]17TAXMAN64(Bom)

the assessment year 1967-68, by order dated March 18, 1968, and computed the total net wealth at Rs. 20,44,794. The assessment for the assessment year 1968-69 was completed by order dated August 22, 1970, and the net

Aleli and Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit, Circle 6(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)7SOT639(Mum.)

perused the records, and duly considered the factual matrix of the case as also the applicable legal position.Section 273B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 inter alia clearly lays done that in case assessee can demonstrate a

Dy. Cit, Circle-6(2) Vs. Decibelle Electronics (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)5SOT783(Mum.)

decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Podar Cement (P) Ltd. (1997) 226 ITR 625 (SC). The learned Departmental Representative also drew our attention to the CBDT circular explaining the nature and purpose … is filed by the revenue. The assessment year involved is 1995-96. It is directed against the order dated 23-3-2001 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) XLII and arises out of the assessment completed under section 147 of the