6 1 - Judgment Search Results
Mahle Anand Filter Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Mahle Filter S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2019
from other judgments were also noticed by this Court in Triveni Engineering (supra). ITA1592019 Page 4 of 5 6. This Court is also un-persuaded with the argument that the amount of ₹5.8 crores, could be treated as … CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) % 1. The assessee questions the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for A.Y. 2008-09 and submits that
Sap Labs India Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer Circle 6 (1) (1) ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-19-2023
Diary No.15762/2019) CIVIL APPEAL No.8699OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.14992/2019) CIVIL APPEAL No.8700 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.14996/2019) CA84632022 ETC. Page 6 of 29 CIVIL APPEAL No.8701 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.14997/2019) CIVIL APPEAL No.8697 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.14990/2019) CIVIL APPEAL … No.8675 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.11071/2019) CIVIL APPEAL No.9401 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.24236/2022 @ Diary No.30692/2019) CA84632022 ETC. Page 1 of 29 CIVIL APPEAL No.9023 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil) No.22603/2022 @ Diary No.21406/2019) CIVIL APPEAL No.8465 OF2022(Arising from SLP(Civil)
M/S. Bharat Bijlee Limited, Mumbai Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of I ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
Oral Judgment: (S.J. Vazifdar, J.) 1. The petitioner has challenged a notice issued by respondent No.1 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, under section 148 … plus the 4th Adjustment and plus the 5th Adjustment and Bonds B shall be subject to plus the 6th Adjustment.? 3. By an agreement titled Second Amendment Agreement dated 13.08.2004, clause 4 of the agreement dated 31.05.2004
18-section briefs on any result in this list
C.N. Anantharam Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 6(1) ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-10-2014
land and building separately and to allow deduction in case any one of them-as long term capital asset. 6. The tribunal relied on the judgment of the Kerala High Court in the case of Vasavan v. CIT … N. Kumar, J. 1. The assessee has preferred this appeal challenging the finding recorded by the authorities below where in they have
M/s. Alliance Space Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Income Tax Officer 6(1)(1), Mumb ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
to two notices dated 24th March, 2015 and 29th March, 2014 respectively issued by the Income Tax Officer 6(1)-2, Mumbai under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). 3. We will briefly advert to
Sri Srinivasa Paper and Board Mills Private Ltd., Rep. by the Managing ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-1993
Reported in: 1993(3)ALT538
are filed challenging the notification dated 8-6-1988 issued under Section 4(1) and declaration dated 8-6-1988 issue under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act acquiring the lands of the petitioners for the purpose of expansion of bus-stand
Mohamed I. Unjawala and Etc. Etc. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-1994
Reported in: [1995]213ITR190(Mad)
to be quashed. He draws support from the decisions in Puran Devi v. KLAR, ITO (1988) 169 ITR 608 and K. Subramaniayam v. Income Tax Officer : [1993]199ITR723(Mad) for his argument. In the first decision, it is … have been filed under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the criminal proceedings in CC. Nos. 143 to 145 of 1991 on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences II), Madras. The
Miheer Hemant Mafatlal and Others Vs. N. Rama Iyer, Income-tax Officer ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-17-1984
Reported in: (1985)47CTR(Bom)340; [1986]159ITR515(Bom); [1985]21TAXMAN10(Bom)
the petitioners had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment year 1972-73. 6. It is the obligation of the assessee to disclose all primary facts. For the purposes of reopening an … three children, the widow and the mother of the late Hemant B. Mafatlal, who died intestate on August 16, 1971. Each of the petitioners is entitled to a one-fifth share in the estate of the late Hemant.
Schering Corporation, Patent Department K-6-1 1990 Vs. Asst. Controlle ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
5. We have carefully considered the rival contentions put forward by either side and perused the impugned order. 6. At the outset, it is to be stated that the perusal of the impugned order discloses that the … ORDER No.08/2014 Justice K.N. Basha, Chairman: This appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 18.06.2009 passed by the learned Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, Chennai rejecting the application filed by the appellant
Dy Cit, Circle 6(1) V.B. Arunkumar
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-29-2004
Reported in: (2005)96ITD194(Mum.)
the advance tax payment for assessment year 1996-97, it is found that assessee paid advance tax of Rs. 6 crores and there was a TDS of more than Rs. 39 lakhs. With effective tax rate of 43 … to as AO) to the total income returned by the assessee. The appeal relates to the assessment year 1997-98 for which the corresponding previous year ended on 31st March, 1997. The department has taken the following ground
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free