50 And 112 - Judgment Search Results

Asmi Jewellery India Ltd. and Another Vs. Godrej Consumer Products Ltd ...

Court: Mumbai

case. It was the case where a solicitor's managing clerk obtained an advance in the sum of £ 500 upon a mortgage of property by producing to the society's solicitors a fictitious deed. It was not proved

Hargobind and anr. and Kishore Singh and ors. Vs. Tota Ram

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1914)ILR36All141

are content to refer as authorities on this point to Bishumbhar Dayal v. Parshadi Lal (1912) 10 A. L. L. 112. considered in connection with a very recent case, that of Bakhshi Ram v. Liladhar (1913) I.

National Highways Authority of India vs.patel – Knr (Jv)

Court: Delhi

of 20.05.2004. The Arbitral Tribunal relied on the letter dated 05.11.2004 of the Supervision Consultant, which indicated that 50.112 kms of unobstructed work was to be handed over within a period of six months but only 20.28

M/s Bundl Technologies Private Limited Vs. The Union Of India

Court: Karnataka

why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice. (2) xxx (3) xxx (4) xxx (5) The … was made involuntarily.49. In the case of Acto, Anti-Evasion, Alwar v. Khandelwal Foods Products - 2018 (8) G.S.T.L. 112 (Raj.), in the reply to show cause notice, the Respondent assessee had accepted the excess stock and that

Indira Kumari K.R vs Changanacherry Taluk Cooperative Agricultural and ...

Court: Kerala

OF THE MEMBER’S STATEMENT DATED PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PASSBOOK REGARDING LOAN ACCOUNT NO. L 112/VFC ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT REGARDING THE LOAN OF RS 4,50,000.00. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF

Nishad, vs Authorized Officer,

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 12TH ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 32546 OF 2023 PETITIONER: NISHAD, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.KUNJUMUHAMMED, MANAYIL...

Baburao vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED -2- NOTIFICATION ANNEXURE-J DATED 14.06.2011 IN NO.¹L 112J¸ï.¦.PÀÆå 2011 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 3(1) KIADB ACT BY RESPONDENT NO.1, ANNEXURE-K, DATED 14.06.2011 IN NO.¹L 112 J¸ï.¦.PÀÆå 2011

CochIn Shipyard Limited Represented by Its Deputy General Manger Vs. t ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2011(3)ILR(Ker)904; 2011(4)KLJ276; 2011(4)KLT796; 2011(3)KHC716

officers employed under sub-section (1). 3. By virtue of the powers conferred on the State, under Sections 49, 50 and 112 of the Factories Act, the Government of Kerala has formulated the Kerala Factories (Welfare Officers) Rules, 1957, prescribing … by virtue of the power vested under Sections 49, 50, 112 of the Factories Act. 10. Sections 49, 50 and 112 as mentioned above read as follows: “49. Welfare officers:- (1) In every factory wherein five hundred or more

Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS), Chandigarh Vs. Ivy Health Life Scien ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. This order shall dispose of a bunch of six appeals viz. ITA Nos. 142, 143 of 2013, 156, 157, 159 and 160 of 2014 as learned counsel for the parties are...

State Government of Karnataka (irrigation Departement), Ukp, Bheemaray ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1998(5)KarLJ553

ORDER1. This civil revision petition under Section 115 of the CPC has been filed by the State of Karnataka challenging the judgment and order dated 14-6-1993 passed by Sri D.A. Lathe, Civil Judge, Yadgir, in Arbitration...