5 4 - Judgment Search Results
Ved Prakash Wadhwa Vs. Vishwa Mohan
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-1980
Reported in: AIR1982SC816; (1981)3SCC667; 1980(12)LC725(SC)
V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. The short point raised in this appeal turns on the question as to when the … sense. It must grow out of the evidence in the case. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Sections 304-B, 306 & 498-A : death Father, mother and brother of deceased did not speak of any dowry demand -Father stated that
Tata Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-09-2008
Reported in: AIR2008SC2970; 2008(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2008BusLR683(SC); (2008)4CompLJ220(SC); JT2008(7)SC575; (2008)7MLJ734(SC); 2008(9)SCALE717; (2008)10SCC187; 2008(2)LC825(SC); 2008AIRSCW5015; 2008(4)CivilLJ91
Apex Investments (Mauritius) Limited. As a result of this, the shareholding of Birla Group in IDEA increased to 50.14% while TIL continued to have 31.69% of the issued share capital. The balance 1.70% of IDEA was held … Teleservices Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'TTSL') was granted a basic service licence for Andhra Pradesh Circle on 4.11.1997. A Memorandum of Understanding was arrived at between AT&T; Wireless Inc., AV Birla Group and Tata Industries Limited
Pamuru Vishnu Vinodh Reddy Vs. Chillakuru Chandrasekhara Reddy and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-17-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC1614; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)373; 2003(2)SCALE242; (2003)3SCC445; [2003]2SCR57; 2003(2)LC820(SC)
Commissioner for ascertaining the value of the share of the plaintiff as on the date also as on 5.4.1971. Thereafter, the son of the deceased plaintiff (appellant herein) filed I.A. No. 270 of 1987 to decide the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shemaroo Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Afzal Khan, Proprietor of Shaboo ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: (2008)110BOMLR3346; LC2008(3)340
claim, objection from any third party after publication of notice in the Trade Magazines. An amount of Rs 50 lakhs was to be paid on 25/4/2007 and an amount of Rs 3.50 crores was to be paid
New Taj Mahal Cafe Pvt. Ltd. by Its Executive Director, K. Jagadish Sh ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-26-2009
Reported in: (2009)25VST101(Karn); 2009(3)KCCRSN97; 2009(5)AIRKarR167; AIR2009NOC2987
on the total consideration for the works contracts executed.[F] Section 15 of the Act by Karnataka Act No. 5 of 2008 w.e.f. 1.8.2008:15. Composition of tax.- (1) Subject to such conditions and in such circumstances as may … of computing the tax liability of a dealer with reference to his total (sic) lower percentage of about 4% or the total turnover irrespective of the composition of the net turnover being inclusive of many known non-taxable
Shri Subhash Seth S/O Late Dr. D.D. Seth, Vs. New Delhi Hotels Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-11-2010
Reported in: 166(2010)DLT624
2,20,000/- only and before his death he was to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,58,828.95 due as on 5.4.1988, which amount he failed to deposit and consequently on failure of the payment, the aforesaid flat was cancelled
Kirloskar Brothers Limited and Another Vs. Bangalore Water Supply and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-15-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)KarLJ373
behalf it invited tenders from intending tenderers to set up the project. The petitioner and respondents 3 to 5 were the competitors. 3. Before proceeding further, it has to be noted that subsequent to the filing of … writ petition, there has been a change of circumstances, in that, the tender now stands awarded to the 4th respondent in consortium with the 5th respondent and the challenge relates to this awards. As such, other facts
Kamlesh Vs. Sewa
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-06-1997
Reported in: II(1998)DMC216
as RW 3; his neighbourer, Bela Ram, as RW 4; and appellant's father's real brother, Bira, as RW 5. 4. Trial Court on the basis of pleadings and evidence on record dismissed the petition on finding that the … as RW 3; his neighbourer, Bela Ram, as RW 4; and appellant's father's real brother, Bira, as RW 5.4. Trial Court on the basis of pleadings and evidence on record dismissed the petition on finding that the
Shiva Enclave Welfare Society, Rep. by Member, P. Mohan Raj and ors. V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-1996
Reported in: 1997(2)ALT761
the title of respondents 3 to 5 and therefore, the possession cannot be delivered to respondents 3 to 5. 4. Before proceeding further, it is necessary to refer to the previous litigation between respondents 6 to 11 and … the title of respondents 3 to 5 and therefore, the possession cannot be delivered to respondents 3 to 5.4. Before proceeding further, it is necessary to refer to the previous litigation between respondents 6 to 11 and
Mohammed Abdul Rahman and ors. Vs. B. Manorama and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2008
Reported in: 2008(4)ALD586; 2008(4)ALT702
to dispose of by common order. These civil revision petitions are filed by thirteen petitioners. Petitioners 1 to 5 are brothers, petitioner No. 6 is wife and petitioners 7 to 13 are children of late Mohammed Abdul … of late Mohammed Abdul Rasheed (other brother of petitioners 1 to 5). All of them filed R.C. No. 473 of 1998 before learned IV Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, for eviction of respondents from non-residential premises bearing Municipal
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free