5 2 - Judgment Search Results

The Marwar Textiles (Agency) Pvt. Vs. the Ito-5(2)(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

the area used by the occupants. For the year under consideration, the assessee declared the income of Rs. 52,575/- under the head 'business income'. The relevant details are given below.Statement showing yearwise recovery of establishment charges made---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sr.Nature … showing yearwise recovery of establishment charges made---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sr.Nature of expenses FY 1994-95 to FY 1998- FY 1999-No. 1997-98 1999 2000---------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. Cambay Investments Ltd. 90000 99000 126000---------------------------------------------------------------------------------2. Oriental Co. Ltd. 90000 99000 126000---------------------------------------------------------------------------------3. Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. 180000

Date of Decision: 5.2.2014 Vs. Vinod Kumar

Court: Punjab and Haryana

` 2000/- as compensatory costs, to be paid by the defendant-company to the plaintiff. Sd/- (Mehinder Singh Sullar) 5.2.2014 Judge AS Arvind Kumar Sharma 2014.02.10 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Date of Decision:- 5.2.2014 Vs. Balwinder Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3922 of 2000 Date of Decision:- 5.2.2014 Arjan Singh & Ors. ......Petitioners Versus Balwinder Singh .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.S.C.Arora,

Date of Decision: 5.2.2014 Vs. Mukesh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

decided in appropriate proceedings and filing of the present application is no remedy available to Smt. Santro Devi.”. 5. Meaning thereby, the District Judge (Family Court) has examined the matter in right perspective and has recorded the … Civil Revision No.7947 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7947 of 2013 Date of

PVP Ventures Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Corporate ...

Court: Chennai

value at the beginning and at the end of the relevant year, the Assessing Officer concluded in para 5 of the Order of Assessment dated 31.12.2010 that the assessee had income from undisclosed sources assessable under Section … petitions filed by the appellant, questioning a show cause notice dated 12.1.2015 and an order of assessment dated 20.1.2015 passed after reopening of assessment. 2. We have heard Mr. R. Sivaraman, learned counsel for the appellant and

K. Adinarayana Reddy Vs. Govt., of A.P. Rep. by Its Prl. Secretary to ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(2)ALT760

issued and the same was served on the petitioner on 26-6-1996, to which the petitioner filed reply on 5-9-1996. The District Collector after considering the explanation of the petitioner cancelled the said Caste Certificate dated 4-5-1980, issued … R.D.O., Bhadrachalam, a show-cause notice dated 4-7-1996 was issued and the same was served on the petitioner on 26-6-1996, to which the petitioner filed reply on 5-9-1996. The District Collector after considering the explanation of the petitioner

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. 1. Loonkar Tools Pvt. Ltd. (D. B. I. T. ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1995)127CTR(Raj)77; [1995]213ITR721(Raj)

section 2(45) total income has been defined to mean the total amount of income referred to in section 5 computed in the manner laid down in this Act. Section 5 contains the scope of total income which

M/S Yennarkay Printers Pvt. Ltd., No. 5-2-15-e, Sattur Road, Sivakasi- ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2000(4)CTC52

printing with four partners. The said partnership firm was dissolved by a deed of dissolution dated 13.4.1982. Clause 5 and 12 of the deed are asfollows: 'Clause 5: The partners hereby mutually agree that pioneer press private … filed to issue a writ of certiorarai calling for the recourses of the respondents in proceedings No.B2/TN/20334/ENF/MDU/93 dated 2.2.1993 quash the same. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the managing Director of M/s