Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

41 A - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2014

inderjeet Singh Vs. China Airlines (41 Rating) and Another

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Feb-11-2014

Matched in: Parties inderjeet Singh Vs. China Airlines (41 Rating) and Another


Jul 02 2018

M/S New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Commissioner Income ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-02-2018

RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9199 OF2017NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VERSUS … APPELLANT(S) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 41 & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) WITH2CIVIL APPEAL NO.15615 OF2017M/S. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF


Aug 26 1983

The Transport Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and anr. Vs. S. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-26-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC153; AIR1983SC1225; 1983(2)SCALE206; (1983)4SCC245; [1983]3SCR729; 1983 Cri LJ 1506

Matched in: Parties The Transport Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and anr. Vs. S. Sardar Ali, Bus Owner, Hyderabad and 41 ors.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 16 2024

Gulshan Medicare Door No.41/2015 vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-16-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 26TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 37995 OF 2015 PETITIONER/S: 1 GULSHAN MEDICARE DOOR NO.41/2015 AMULIA...


Oct 06 2023

Lalichan Thomas vs Udayagiri Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. No. I-41

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-06-2023

CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CRP SECTION,OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO- 0PERATIVE SOCIETIES(G),IDUKKI,ADMINISTRATOR OF UDAYAGIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1- 41,PRAKASH.P,KATTAPPANA,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3 JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G), IDUKKI-685603.BY GOVT.PLEADER:SMT.SHEEJA C S THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP


Mar 10 2026

C. MURALI (M/a 41 Yrs) Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-10-2026

Matched in: Parties C. MURALI (M/a 41 Yrs) Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police,


Mar 02 2015

1hafizullaha Mir; Age 41 Years Vs. 1 State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Mar-02-2015

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU LPASW No. 161 OF2014AND LPASW No. 162 OF20141Hafizullaha Mir; age 41 years S/o Sh. Feroz Din Mir R/o Jathji, Doda. 2 Rajeev Singh Kotwal; age 46 years S/o Sh.


Aug 02 2004

M. Srinivasa Charyulu S/O M.V.N. Charyulu and Vs. District Registrar ( ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-02-2004

Reported in: AIR2005AP32; 2004(5)ALT804

of the same would support the averments in the counter affidavit that the action was initiated under Section 41A of the Indian Stamp Act,1899 (for brevity 'the Act') by issuing a notice to the petitioners on 25-11-1994,


Jan 31 2005

K.S. Varadarajan Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Appeal), Madras (A ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-31-2005

Reported in: 2005(1)CTC538; (2005)IILLJ6Mad

Matched in: Parties K.S. Varadarajan Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Appeal), Madras (Appellate Authority under Section 41(2) of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947) and the Management, Mandavelipakkam Women's Consumer Co-operative Stores Ltd. (31.01.2005 - MADHC)


Nov 06 2007

The Management of Madras Atomic Power Project Employees Consumers Co O ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-06-2007

Reported in: (2007)6MLJ1334

Co-operative Stores Limited, having unsuccessfully challenged the order passed by the appellate authority under Sub-section (2) of Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as 'Shops Act') has preferred this


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial