4 4 - Judgment Search Results
Date of Decision:-4.4.2014 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
27 of the Arms Act by the police of Police Station Sadar Fazilka, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for
Date of Decision:-4.4.2014 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
dated 18.6.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 148, 302, 307, 364, 452, 323, 324, 326 and 506 read with section 149 IPC by the police of Police Station Mahilpur, District
Date of Decision:-4.4.2014 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by the police of Police Station Kotwali, District Kapurthala, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sandeep S. Shah Vs. Income-tax Officer, City Ward Iv(4)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2001
Reported in: [2002]254ITR146(Mad)
R. Jayasimha Babu, J.1. The appeal is admitted and is also being disposed of finally by this order as counsel for the Revenue who was present took notice and she has also been heard.2. The question...
Siemens India Ltd. and Another Vs. K. Subramanian, Ito, Companies Circ ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-30-1982
Reported in: (1983)34CTR(Bom)23; [1983]143ITR120(Bom); [1983]13TAXMAN146(Bom)
a notice of demand dated January 14, 1975, issued in pursuance of the said assessment order.2. Under s. 4 of the Surtax Act, every company is liable to pay for every assessment year commencing on and from
Volkart Brothers and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Companies Circle Iv( ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-06-1967
Reported in: [1967]65ITR179(Bom)
reasons why we are inclined to take the view on merits that the provision can have no application. 4. The provision of section 17(1) with which we are concerned came on the statute book in 1951 in
Shri Anil Kumar Goel Vs. the Ito Range Iv(4)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Decided on: Feb-12-2007
Reported in: (2008)116TTJLuck239
two(2) weeks thereafter and till the appeals are disposed of by the Tribunal, the Respondent No. 2 to 4 shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner on the basis of order dated 11.10.06 and 27.12.2006
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free