4 3 - Judgment Search Results

Ms. Kovai Sarala the Assistant Commissioner Vs. Central Circle Iv(3).

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

admitted that the appeal had to be restored back to ld. CIT (Appeals) to be decided on merits. 4. We find that the CIT (Appeals) had not adjudicated the issues on merits but had dismissed it for … that she did not enter appearance on the dates of postings for hearing. 2 I.T. (SS) A. No. 35/Mds/12 2. Learned A.R. submitted that ld. CIT (Appeals) had no power to dismiss appeal filed before him for

Shri Abhay Pratap Singh Sengar Vs. the Ito 4(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

the preceding years. The AO noticed that assessee had not been in India as per certificate as under: 4. The AO observed that from this chart it was evident that during the relevant assessment year under consideration … of the assessee was 'resident but not ordinarily resilient'. He has relied on the following cases: 279 ITR 310 Sedco Forex International Drill Inc. and Ors. v CIT (S.C.) 6. In the case before the Authority for

Date of Decision: 4.3.2013 Vs. Pritam Singh and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No.913 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:4. 3.2013 Gurtej Singh .....Appellant(s) Versus Pritam Singh and Anr....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.M.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for the

Date of Decision: 4.3.2013 Vs. Harjinder Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

husband is already facing two proceedings namely (i) for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C and (ii) under Sections 406/498-A IPC before the courts at Khanna and thus the respondent-husband would suffer no inconvenience if his petition for … HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A No.647 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision:4. 3.2013 Ranbir Kaur .....Petitioner(s) Versus Harjinder Singh ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.H.S.Diwana, Advocate for the petitioner-wife.

Date of Decision: 4.3.2014 Vs. Netar Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.1608 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 4.3.2014 Sant Ram ....Petitioner Versus Netar Singh & Others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present : Mr.S.D.Bansal,

Date of Decision:4.3.2014 Vs. Gaje Singh and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the disciplinary authority awarded a punishment of ‘Censure’ on 02.02.2012. The Appellate Authority reviewed the punishment order on 30.07.2012 and ordered for de-novo proceedings after the stage of the Diwakar Gulati 2014.03.19 16:05 I attest to the

Date of Decision:4.3.2014 Vs. Gram Panchayat Village Hussainpura and O ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

son of Rahim Baksh. The said vendee also further sold it to different persons as mentioned in para 4 of the writ petition. It is further pleaded that consolidation was undertaken of the village in the year

Best Cybercity (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) & An ...

Court: Delhi

ORDER2105.2019 1. The... Petitioner challenges a notice dated 29th March, 2018 issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3) (hereafter Assessing Officer, AO) under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking

Bharat Textile Works and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer Circle-iv, 3-a, ( ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1978]114ITR28(Guj)

registered with the income-tax authorities under the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioners Nos. 2,3 and 4 are three of the five partners of the first petitioner-firm. Along with those five partners one minor, Shashikant