4 2 - Judgment Search Results

Clean Solar Power (Jodhpur) Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of ...

Court: Delhi

Yash Srivastava, Ms. Satakshi Sood, Ms. Naimishi Verma & Ms. Dirshti Kochhar, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4 (2) NEW DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. V.K. Saksena & Ms. Hemlata Rawat,

Date of Decision:-4.2.2013 Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

co-accused, vide FIR No.218 dated 15.12.2012 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 IPC, by the police of Police Station Jhabal, District Tarn Taran, invoking the provisions of Section … CRM not M-3739 of 2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-3739 of 2013 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 4.2.2013 Vs. Sandeep Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

wife on 18.6.2010 took her back to her parental house. Subsequently, an FIR No.130 dated 31.8.2010 under Sections 406/498-A IPC, P.S Kotwali, Nabha was registered against the husband and T.A.No.560 of 2012 #2# the mother-in-law. The wife

Date of Decision: 4.2.2013 Vs. Sadhu Ram Angra and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

C.R.No.283 of 2013 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.283 of 2013 Date

Date of Decision:-4.2.2013 Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by the police of Police Station Dirba, District Sangrur, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC.”2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State.”3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties,

Phelix Appliances Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward-4 (2)

Court: Gujarat

Appeal No.17 of 2001. Making above submissions, it is requested to admit / allow the present Tax Appeal. 4. Heard Shri Tej Shah, learned advocate for the appellant- assessee. At the outset, it is required to be … Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") dated 31.07.2013 passed in ITA No.2536/AHD/2012 for AY 2009-10, the assessee has preferred the present Tax Appeal with the following proposed question of law. "A. Whether on

income-tax Officer 'F' Ward, District IV(2) and Ors. Vs. Murlidhar Sar ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1974Cal272,[1975]99ITR485(Cal)

with law as the tribunal would consider fit and proper. The Rule was made absolute to that extent. 4. Against that order of the learned Judge the present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue under Clause … order passed in this Court by our learned brother Sabyasachi Mukharji, J. disposing of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution by directing the Appellate Income-tax Tribunal to consider the application for restoration of the appeal

The Acit, Cir 4(2) M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills. Mumbai-. Ltd Vs. World ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

1. This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Ld.CIT(A) -8, Mumbai dated 23.11.2011 for the Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Ground No. 1 relates to the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) in deleting … explained that the amount of such subsidy cannot be held to reduce the actual cost of assets u/s 43(1) Explanation 10 of the Act. The Ld. Counsel has also placed reliance on the decisions of the Tribunal

Dy. Cit, Ward 4(2) Vs. Advent Pharma (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)4SOT42(Mum.)

and in law, the CIT(A) erred in treating the excise duty of Rs. 3,03,080 as allowable under section 43B when the said amount was relating to closing stock of current assessment year and sales of next assessment … sales of next assessment year totally disregarding the established principle of matching income with expenses available in sections 28 & 29." The main grievance of the revenue is that CIT(A) had deleted the addition of Rs. 3,03,080

Sankeya Chemicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit, Circle 4(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)8SOT50(Mum.)

together with arrangements and obligations, licences quotas, etc., relating to the undertaking to be transferred in due course.Para 4 All liabilities and obligations, rents, rates, taxes, claims, settlements, duties, etc., up to the period prior to the … had entered into an agreement dated 1-4-1990 for the sale of going concern at a price of Rs. 20 lakhs. It was agreed between the parties as under : Para 1 The vendor shall sell and the