35 A - Judgment Search Results
Vembarasan M/35, Vs State by Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 corresponding offence under Sections 294(b), 324, 506 IPC in Crime No.64
SaravananM/35 Vs State, represented by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-11-2026
Matched in: Parties SaravananM/35 Vs State, represented by, The Inspector of Police,
Agastin, Male 35 Years vs State by,the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-09-2025
of 500 ml Kingfisher Draught Beer, 20 Nos. of 275 ml of Backardi Breezer and 3 Nos. of 35 litre plastic cane containing rectified spirit (MO1 to MO5), found. On opening the plastic cane (MO5), pungent poisonous
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mumin @ Prabagaran(35/2024), vs the Chief Medical Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.11.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI Mumin @ Prabagaran(35/2024), Petitioner Vs of Birth & Death, Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of...
Gyarsa and 35 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-15-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(3)Raj2181
Birbal (PW. 14), Jagdish (PW. 17) Khayali Ram (PW. 18), Jai Ram (PW. 26) and Gulla Ram (PW. 35).8. Having scanned the testimony of prosecution witnesses we find that the prosecution is able to establish consistently that
“35. in the Instant Case the Explanation Furnished by the Vs. Prem S ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
CRM-A No.51-MA of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-A No.51-MA of 2013 Date of decision :14. 3.2013 Prem Singh ........Applicant-appellant versus Manjit Singh and others .......Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble...
Mallika, M/35 Years Vs. the State Rep.by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 07.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.866 of 2014 Mallika, M/35 Years W/o.Ramesh Kumar (late) Kajapettai, Trichy. . . Petitioner Vs....
Sundarammal, Age 35 Vs. 1.State Represented By,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-05-2014
DATED:05. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.352 of 2014 Sundarammal, age 35 W/o.Karuppasamy, 1/48, Keela Theru, Sevalkulam Kuruvikulam Post, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District. .. Petitioner versus 1.State represented by, The
35 No. Pakoria MIn Samabai Samity Ltd. Vs. Assam Fisheries Development ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Mar-10-2003
Matched in: Parties 35 No. Pakoria MIn Samabai Samity Ltd. Vs. Assam Fisheries Development Corpn. Ltd. and ors.
No. 35 Pakaria MIn Samabai Samity Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-18-1996
Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application for judicial review in respect of an order of settlement No. 35 Pakaria Min Mahal of Morigaon by the respondent No. 1, the Government of Assam with consultation with respondent
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free