313 And 374 - Judgment Search Results

Prabhu and Others Vs. State by Inspector of Police, Tiruppathur Taluk ...

Court: Chennai

and the final report filed. 12. When the above incriminating materials were put to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C., they denied the same as false. However, no witnesses was examined on their side nor marked any … (Prayer: Criminal Appeals filed under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code against the judgement of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Vellore, Tiruppattur,

R. Sankar Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

and the final report filed. 3. When the above incriminating materials were put to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C., they denied the same as false. On their side, the first accused examined himself as D.W.1 and … (Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge

Laxman Bapu Sonar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2004CriLJ2229; (2004)3GLR2129

appearing against them in the evidence of prosecution witnesses and recorded their further statements as required by Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.11. In their further statements, the case of the appellants was that they … J.M. Panchal, J.1. Both the appeals filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, are directed against common judgment dated March 16, 1999, rendered by

ismail Adam Mitha Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)2GLR1813

Both the criminal appeals are accordingly rejected. Criminal - narcotic substance - Sections 233 (2), 293 (2), 313, 374 and 378 91) (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 8, 15 to 23, 25, 29, 35, 35 … Ex.87; FSL report for primary analysis of muddamal seized vide panchnama Ex.87 at Ex.95; FSL reports Exs.309 to 313; Hotel King's entry in the register Ex.52; Hotel King's bill Ex.224; Hotel City Palace entry Ex.54; arrest memo

Annaduurai and Another Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Mech ...

Court: Chennai

final report against the accused. 17. When the above incriminating materials were put to the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. they denied the same as false. However, they did not choose to examine any witness on … conviction and the sentences imposed on the appellants are hereby confirmed. Criminal Procedure Code - Section 313, Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code - Section 302, Section 380, Section 396, Section 450, Section 457 - Evidence Act

Yuvaraj Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Gopichettipalayam Police ...

Court: Chennai

302, Section 380, Section 392 - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 161, Section 162, Section 174, Section 313, Section 374 - Appeal against conviction - Trial Court has convicted Appellant/Accused for an offence punishable under Section

A. Dharaniselvam Vs. The Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

are set aside. Fine amount, if any, shall be refunded. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313, Section 374, Section 209, Section 207, Section 164 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 317, Section 364, Section 302 and … to 22. 7. When the accused was examined on the incriminating aspects in the prosecution evidence under Section 313 Cr.P.C., he denied the offences. 8. In his written statement the accused mainly stated as under:- He had

Karamjit Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1311; 2003CriLJ2021; [2003(3)JCR33(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC249; 2003(3)SCALE398; (2003)5SCC291; [2003]3SCR25; 2003(2)LC799(SC)

of its case examined 14 witnesses and filed some documentary evidence. The appellant in his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. denied the prosecution case. He stated that the quarter was not in his possession and he was … appeals and is valid so far as to the procedure of hearing appeals. [1117D- E, 1118C] While s. 374 confers a right of appeal, s. 375 and s. 376 restrict such a right. Section 384 prescribes the

State of Maharashtra Vs. Mehtabi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1998)8SCC618

was present after 10.30 a.m. on May 13, 1977. The accused has stated in her statement under Section 313 of the CrPC that she left the house at 10.30 a.m. with a tiffin to the ST Depot … undergo the remaining period of sentence. Criminal - dyeing declaration - Section 32 of Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 374 and 386 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - two dyeing declarations stating involvement of accused not contrary -

S. Jaisingh Vs. State by Inspector of Police (L and O)

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004CriLJ3598

exhibits and 6 material objects. After the evidence of prosecution was over, the accused was questioned under S. 313 of Cr.P.C. as to that part of the evidence which is incriminating and prejudicial to his interest, and … 376(2) of I.P.C. With this modification, this criminal appeal is dismissed. Criminal - assault of minor - Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code and Section 376 of Indian Penal Code - when prosecution in case of physical