3 C - Judgment Search Results
S. Jothilingam and 46 ors. Vs. the State Rep., by the Deputy Superinte ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-21-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)CTC295
were got registered against the petitioners in Crime No. 762 of 1987 Under Sections 147, 148, 448, 452, 353, 323, 324, 307, and 332 IPC. when the 9th petitioner was in the lock-up, he was forced to … ORDERShivappa, J.1. Petitioners are seeking for quashing the proceedings in Crime No. 762 of 1987 on the file of the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Erode. The case of the
Calcutta Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of Customs (Appg.) Un ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-20-1983
Reported in: 1984(17)ELT244(Bom)
to be imported under the import replenishment licences against the export of the products on or before May 31, 1978 the exemption shall only be from so much of that portion of duty of customs leviable thereon … 1. The petitioner is a limited company and has its main office at Calcutta. The petitioner is exporter of textiles and fabrics and is engaged
S. Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. Chairman, Departmental Promotion Committ ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-1984
Reported in: (1985)2MLJ241
passed a trade test in terms of S.R.O. No. 109 of 1964 which has been framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The said S.R.O. No. 109 of 1964, as amended from time to time, … 1. These appeals are directed against the common Judgment of Padmanabhan, J. in Writ Petitions Nos. 541, 10551 of 1981 and 6457 of 1982 dismissing the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Brij Bhushan Lal Parduman Kumar Vs. C.i.T., Haryana Himachal Pradesh a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-06-1978
Reported in: AIR1979SC209; [1978]115ITR524(SC); (1979)3SCC14; [1979]2SCR16; 1978(10)LC818(SC)
The assessment year involved was 1966-67 for which the accounting year commenced on 1-10-1964 and ended on September 30, 1965. The assessee-firm had taken two contracts, one at Delhi and the other at Ambala. For the said … V.D. Tulzapurkar, J.1. The short question raised in these appeals by special leave is whether the cost of materials supplied by the Government (M.E.S. Department) for being used in the execution of works is liable
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free