3 And 3 1 - Judgment Search Results

Roborant Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, 3(3)(1)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)7SOT250(Mum.)

that ground No. 2 is not pressed by the assessee hence, this is also rejected.As regards ground Nos, 3 to 7 are concerned, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee had acquired from Mantec … assessee arise out of the CWT(A)'s separate orders dated under section 80-0/304 and 29-7-2004 for the assessment year 1998-99 and 1999-2000 respectively.The grounds in both the appeals are identical except an additional ground No. 7 for the