3 4 - Judgment Search Results

Ramesh Kumar Singhania Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(4), Purulia and ...

Court: Kolkata

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE RAMESH KUMAR SINGHANIA Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 4).PURULIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANINDITA ROY SARASWATI Date :27. h August,

Date of Decision:3.4.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.4651 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4651 of 2014 Date of decision:3.4.2014 Gurwinder Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT...

M/S. Newfields Advertising (P) Ltd., 3/4-a, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi-1 ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1976)5CTR(Del)0264C

who are solely responsible for payment. 23,117.40 on account of sales-tax and penalty for the assessment year 1969-70. 4. Apprehending that the liability of the petitioner to sales-tax would be assessed by the assessing authority in respect … time to time on account of the advertisers. On May 6, 1968, the petitioner received notice dated April 30, 1968 in form No. S.T. XIV in respect of the assessment years 1963-64 to 1967-68 (Annexure C) from

Hanuman Prasad Agarwal Vs. Income-tax Officer, Dist. Iii(iv), Kanpur a ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1965]57ITR633(All)

and the Tahsildar/Magistrate, Income-tax, Kanpur, from taking any further steps for the delivery of possession of house No. 30/137 Ghumni Mohal, Kanpur, to the auction purchaser in pursuance of the auction held on September 4, 1963.The facts

Raj Kumar Vs. Income-tax Officer, District Iii (iv), Kanpur, and Anoth ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1963]47ITR510(All)

24,951-14-0. On January 25, 1956, a notice was issued to the petitioner to pay the arrears by January 31, 1956. It is stated in paragraph 10 of the affidavit that the petitioners father was a partner with … 7,1956, and February 15, 1956, penalties of Rs. 2,000, Rs, 3,000 and Rs. 1,000 were imposed under section 46(1) in respect of the years 1944-45, 1946-47 and 1950-51 respectively. The petitioner filed appeals against the penalty orders,