3 3 - Judgment Search Results

Dinesh T. Tailor Vs. the Tax Recovery Officer, Range 3(3),

Court: Mumbai

1987. During the period when he was a director, the petitioner signed audited accounts of the company on 30 June 1987 and 30 June 1988. The petitioner resigned as a director of the company on 14 October

Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Vs. Smt.Santosh Rani

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1536 of 2014 Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Sukhwinder Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Smt.Santosh Rani ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present : Mr.Parvesh Sachdeva, Advocate

Date of Decision:3.3.2014 Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the circular dated 10.10.1997 appended with the reply of the respondent filed before the Armed Forces Tribunal. Clause 3(f) of such criteria contemplate that an individual will not be considered for promotion within one year of the

Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Vs. Davinder Kaur

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1539 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Bakhtawar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Davinder Kaur ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present : Mr.Prateek Pandit, Advocate

Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Vs. Geeta Devi and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1511 of 2014 Date of Decision: 3.3.2014 Naresh Kumar Garg ....Petitioner Versus Geeta Devi and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present :

Date of Decision:3.3.2014 Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and Othe ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.3854 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3854 of 2014 Date of decision:3.3.2014 Union of India and others ….Petitioners VERSUS Central Administrative Tribunal and others .....Respondents CORAM:...

Babu Lal Kedia Vs. Income-tax Officer, Dist. Iii (iii), Kanpur, and An ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1968]70ITR345(AP)

earlier assessment year 1947-48, which had been upheld by the Income-tax Appellate tribunal by its order dated April 3, 1957. The petitioner then applied in revision under section 33A(2) to the Commissioner of Income-tax against the order

M/S. H. K. Paul and Brothers Pvt. Ltd. 3/3 Maharshri Debendra Road, Ca ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1976)5CTR(Cal)190

Sabysaschi Mukharj, J. - In the facts and circumstances of the case I direct the respondents to return the books of accounts seized within a period of ten weeks from this date and must complete the...

Ramkrishna Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. the Ito 8(3)(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

agency commission do not form part of export turnover eligible for claiming exemption u/s. 10A of the Act. 3. In alternative and without prejudice to this ground, the assessee has also raised additional ground by which it

Assistant Cit, Circle 3(3) Vs. Prerna Premises (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)7SOT288(Mum.)

was completed in the assessment year 1993-94 in which the entire profit was claimed as deduction under section 33AC of the Income Tax Act. Before the assessing officer, during the course of the assessment proceedings for the