22 3 - Judgment Search Results
Date of Decision: 22.3.2013 Vs. Ajay Khurana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
the aforesaid factual position, I find that the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. March 22, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manot JUDGE … HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.352 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:22. 3.2013 Poonam Khurana .....Petitioner(s) Versus Ajay Khurana ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: None for the petitioner-wife. Mr.Kiran
Date of Decision: 22.3.2013 Vs. Vikram Sharma
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
to the District Courts, Yamuna Nagar for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal. March 22, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manot JUDGE … HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.413 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:22. 3.2013 Rajni Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Versus Vikram Sharma ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.J.S.Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner-wife.
Date of Decision: 22.3.2013 Vs. Gurprinder Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
transferred to the District Courts, Moga for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal. March 22, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manot JUDGE … HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.423 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:22. 3.2013 Sarabjeet Kaur .....Petitioner(s) Versus Gurprinder Singh ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Date of Decision: 22.3.2013 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
has not been supplied any copy in spite of requests in that regard. Dismissed for not prosecution. March 22, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manot JUDGE … THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3180 of 2004 Date of Decision:22. 3.2013 Tarsem Lal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: None for the petitioner.
Sanjivani Non-Ferrous Trading Pvt. Ltd. Vs.income Tax Officer Ward 22( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2019
1. The petitioner challenges the reopening of the assessment for AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 - through orders dated 31.03.2018. In both the cases, the assessments were originally completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free