Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

22 1 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 27 2005

Chandra Enterprise Vs. Ito Ward 22(1)(4)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-27-2005

Reported in: (2005)96ITD341(Mum.)

Matched in: Parties Chandra Enterprise Vs. Ito Ward 22(1)(4)


Aug 22 2013

Surinder Madan Vs. Asistant Commissioner of Income Tax,circle 22(1),

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2013

2013 % SURINDER MADAN Through ....Appellant Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate. Versus ASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 22 1), NEW DELHI Respondent Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV


Jan 22 2014

Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.24043 of 2013 Date of decision: 22.1.2014 Sulakhan Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE FATEH


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 2014

Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. Madan Mohan and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

stipulated period and their defence was struck off by the trial Court, by means of impugned order dated 22.11.2013 (Annexure P2).2. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner-defendant No.1 has preferred the present petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this


Jan 22 2014

Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. Smt.Parkash Devi and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

Civil Revision No.2081 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision Petition No.2081 of 2013 Date of … Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has preferred the present petition, invoking the superintendence jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with


Jan 22 2014

Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.107 of 2014 Date of decision: 22.1.2014 Amarjit ….Appellant VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE FATEH DEEP


Oct 25 2017

Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. (Formerly Known As(m/S Samvar ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-25-2017

writ petitions impugning two notices dated 30th March, 2015, issued by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22(1), New Delhi under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) relating to Assessment


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial