22 1 - Judgment Search Results
Chandra Enterprise Vs. Ito Ward 22(1)(4)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-27-2005
Reported in: (2005)96ITD341(Mum.)
Matched in: Parties Chandra Enterprise Vs. Ito Ward 22(1)(4)
Surinder Madan Vs. Asistant Commissioner of Income Tax,circle 22(1),
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
2013 % SURINDER MADAN Through ....Appellant Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate. Versus ASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 22 1), NEW DELHI Respondent Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV
Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.24043 of 2013 Date of decision: 22.1.2014 Sulakhan Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE FATEH
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. Madan Mohan and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
stipulated period and their defence was struck off by the trial Court, by means of impugned order dated 22.11.2013 (Annexure P2).2. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner-defendant No.1 has preferred the present petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this
Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. Smt.Parkash Devi and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
Civil Revision No.2081 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision Petition No.2081 of 2013 Date of … Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has preferred the present petition, invoking the superintendence jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with
Date of Decision: 22.1.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.107 of 2014 Date of decision: 22.1.2014 Amarjit ….Appellant VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE FATEH DEEP
Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. (Formerly Known As(m/S Samvar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2017
writ petitions impugning two notices dated 30th March, 2015, issued by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22(1), New Delhi under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) relating to Assessment
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free