2021 16 Scc217 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2021 16 scc217 Year: 2018 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.145 seconds)Jarnail Singh Vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta .
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-26-2018
without which the structure of equality of opportunity in article 16 would collapse layer and 35 backwardness inadequacy is not bound pointed out that in indra sawhney case 1992 supp 3 scc217 the court had permitted subclassification of 27 the therefore other
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConfederation of Sadar Bazar Trader S Association (Regd.) vs.union of ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-23-2018
had never been considered by the author of the mpd 2021 i e the dda this court directs that a meeting 2016 page 16 of 34 clear mandate given in clause 16 2 of mpd 2021 north dmc cannot notify the redevelopment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dcm Limited & Anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2018
in terms of the prevalent master plan i e mpd 2021 cannot be denied merely because at the time when the court in m c mehta vs union of india 2013 16 scc336 whereby the powers of the m c were confined
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Vasumati Mahajan and Anr. Vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation an ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-13-2018
right is prescribed and permitted by the master plan delhi 2021 it is also stated that mpd 2021 specifically enumerates the the context has not been dealt with by the court 16 he states even otherwise in view of the decision of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dcm Limited & Anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-27-2018
converting the area as commercial in the guise of mpd 2021 violating the orders of the hon ble supreme court emphasis conforming areas in delhi 41 in its subsequent decision dated 16 02 2006 in the same petition reported as 2006 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRameshwar Vs. State of Haryana
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-12-2018
19 09 2005 para 17 5 of this regional plan 2021 deals with zoning regulations under which four zones are contemplated 13 25 041 acres fourteen 14 25 378 acres sixteen 16 18 875 acres eleven 11 9 181 acres 19 697
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubodh Dalal vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2018
of relevance this court having noted the provisions of mpd 2021 and held that in terms of clause of 15 7 the coaching centres w p c no 8507 2017 page 16 of 20 be permissible in the ground floor dwelling of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Trust and Ors. Vs.uoi
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-09-2018
land the user prescribed of the subject land under mpd 2021 is found to be institutional and not commercial that 19 or cultural purpose may be allotted land at market value 16 a perusal of the lease deed dated 24th april 1968
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKapil Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate ser.sel.board
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-30-2018
the aforesaid basis that the concerned notification government order dated 16th february 1974 by which it was provided that scheduled castes ors v union of india and ors 1992 supp 3 scc217 observed that article 16 4 of the constitution is aimed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukesh Kumar . Vs. Delhi Subordinate ser.selecn Bd .
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-30-2018
particular state or union territory the enabling provision of article 16 4 of the constitution has to yield to the constitutional ors v union of india and ors 1992 supp 3 scc217 observed that article 16 4 of the constitution is aimed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT