2021 16 Scc217 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2021 16 scc217 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.647 seconds)Vanshika Yadav Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
..... s 80 and kalaimani state of t n v a kalaimani 2021 16 scc217 2019 scc online sc1002 all go to emphasise that a recruiting ..... be lightly disregarded by the high court 12 1998 9 scc23613 2021 4 scc63135 pag e part e substituting its own subjective opinion ..... the preparation vetting solving and typing of the question papers from 16 february to 28 february 2024 subject experts developed two independent sets .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShishir Jaiswal. Vs. State of U.P., Thru. Prin. Secy.,home and Others.
Court : Allahabad
detention of sir abdul khadar kimhali palsthadka by order hd 16 scf 2010 dated 18 09 2010 annexare a as illegal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuman Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1977WLN(UC)510
purposes of rule 244 2 was rightly counted from september 16 1945 and that the petitioner had completer more than 25
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Public Prosecutor Vs. K.V. Subba Rao and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1966AP77; 1966CriLJ253; [1966]18STC35(AP)
the scope of rule 14 a for purposes of rule 16 it is therefore not an offence and consequently the prosecution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNathu Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1976WLN681
motor cycle no rjz 3924 on jaipur ajmer route on 16 8 63 at 4 30 p m acceptance of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishwesh Nath. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.
Court : Allahabad
detention of sir abdul khadar kimhali palsthadka by order hd 16 scf 2010 dated 18 09 2010 annexare a as illegal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarendra Kumar Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court : Patna
notification in my view are violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution and thus the appointments of 234 persons
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDal Chand Agarwal Vs. Divisional Manager, Bank of Maharashtra, Poona a ...
Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1680; (1998)3UPLBEC1656
to terminate the services of permanent employee was not considered 16 from the analysis of the various decisions referred to above
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajinder Kumar @ Pappu Vs. State
Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2001CriLJ4580; 94(2001)DLT201; 2001(60)DRJ111; 2001(78)ECC37
on abdul rashid ibrahim case reported in 2000 68 ecc 16 sc in support of the submission strong reliance was placed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.O.H. Leathers Represented by Its Managing Partner Zeenath Iqbal Vs. ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
v geekay agropack private limited and another 2009 1 cpj 16 sc referred para 23 5 corporation bank and another v
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT