2021 16 Scc217 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2021 16 scc217 Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.179 seconds)Sudhir G. Borgaonkar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-10-2015
1 this appeal by the revenue under section 260 a of the income tax act 1961 the act challenges the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax-8 Vs. Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-03-2015
cit v max india ltd 2007 295 itr 282 2008 166 taxman 188 held that it is settled principle of law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to Governme ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-18-2015
of the writ court in w p nos 16132 to 16134 of 1997 and the materials on record 10 the writ
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Saroop Tanneries Ltd.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-09-2015
s j vazifdar actg cj 1 the appeal is liable to be dismissed only on the ground that it is...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector Sagar Maize Products Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-12-2015
1 heard on i a no 3860 2012 an application for condonation of delay 1 1 appeal under section 260a...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeepa E.V. Vs. Union of India
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-20-2015
is violative of her fundamental rights guaranteed under articles 14 16 and 21 of the constitution of india i a to in indra sawhney v union of india 1992 suppl 3 scc217 at paragraph 811 has laid down the following 11 in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-16-2015
is that both are right 167 see para 31 supra 168 constituent assembly debates 24th may 1949 vol viii 169 on 8 scc237 8 2001 7 scc126 9 1992 supp 3 scc217 10 1973 4 scc225 11 1974 2 scc831 12 2014
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Bhaskaran Nair Vs. Stae Bank of Travancore
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-20-2015
the balance amount only will be payable to the employee 16 clause 9 provided for general conditions one of the general in bank of baroda v ganpat singh deora 2009 3 scc217 is relevant in the above case the apex court was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegistrar, University of Delhi Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-27-2015
and more so is in totally ignorance of the mpd 2021 zonal plan of zone c the provisions of the delhi p c 2743 2012 earlier under phase i the page 16 of 44 vishwavidyalaya metro station used to be terminal station
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajendra Shankar Shukla and Ors. Etc. Vs. State of Chhatisgarh and Ors ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-29-2015
without taking into consideration any report revised the master plan 2021 to suit it to the requirement of the kvtds therefore formulate a town development scheme is to get over section 16 and freeze development activities under section 53 it would amount
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT