2015 1 Scc32 - Judgment Search Results
State of U.P. and Ors. Vs. Chaudhari Ran Beer Singh and Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
custody forthwith to undergo the sentence awarded to him. …………………………J.(A.K. Sikri) …………………………J.(Uday Umesh Lalit) New Delhi, July 01, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (2011) 12 SCC294 [2]. (2010) 4 SCC450[3]. (2013) 14 SCC153[4]. 1993 Supp. (1) SCC32 … sentence awarded to him. …………………………J.(A.K. Sikri) …………………………J.(Uday Umesh Lalit) New Delhi, July 01, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (2011) 12 SCC294 [2]. (2010) 4 SCC450[3]. (2013) 14 SCC153[4]. 1993 Supp. (1) SCC32
Chaitanya Prakash Audichya Vs. Cbi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
custody forthwith to undergo the sentence awarded to him. …………………………J.(A.K. Sikri) …………………………J.(Uday Umesh Lalit) New Delhi, July 01, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (2011) 12 SCC294 [2]. (2010) 4 SCC450[3]. (2013) 14 SCC153[4]. 1993 Supp. (1) SCC32 … sentence awarded to him. …………………………J.(A.K. Sikri) …………………………J.(Uday Umesh Lalit) New Delhi, July 01, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (2011) 12 SCC294 [2]. (2010) 4 SCC450[3]. (2013) 14 SCC153[4]. 1993 Supp. (1) SCC32
Jasmer Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Anr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
with cost of Rs.25,000/- payable to the appellant-workman by the respondent employer. ...............................................................J.[V.GOPALA GOWDA]. ...............................................................J.[C.NAGAPPAN]. NEW DELHI, JANUARY13 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (1999) 6 SCC82[2]. (1999) 2 RSJ266[3]. (1964) 5 SCR64[4]. (2010) 3 SCC192[5]. (2010) 5 SCC497[6]. (2013) … to the appellant-workman by the respondent employer. ...............................................................J.[V.GOPALA GOWDA]. ...............................................................J.[C.NAGAPPAN]. NEW DELHI, JANUARY13 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (1999) 6 SCC82[2]. (1999) 2 RSJ266[3]. (1964) 5 SCR64[4]. (2010) 3 SCC192[5]. (2010) 5 SCC497[6]. (2013) 10 SCC32
18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.S. Ravindran Vs. Branch Managr,new India Assurance Co Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-2015
six weeks. There shall be no order as to costs. …………………………………………………………J.[V.GOPALA GOWDA]. …………………………………………………………J.[C. NAGAPPAN]. New Delhi, May 6, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (1981) 3 SCC225[2]. (1979) 2 SCC80[3]. (2002) 6 SCC41[4]. (2005) 7 SCC406[5]. (2005) 13 SCC428[6]. (2006) … no order as to costs. …………………………………………………………J.[V.GOPALA GOWDA]. …………………………………………………………J.[C. NAGAPPAN]. New Delhi, May 6, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (1981) 3 SCC225[2]. (1979) 2 SCC80[3]. (2002) 6 SCC41[4]. (2005) 7 SCC406[5]. (2005) 13 SCC428[6]. (2006) 6 SCC221[7]. (2013) 10 SCC32
Rajasthan Small Industries Corportion Limited Vs. M/S Ganesh Container ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-23-2019
counsel for the respondent-Contractor submitted that in view of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, if the arbitrator is an employee/advisor or has any past or present business relation or being the Manager/Director … India and Others v. Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Corporation Limited (2015) 2 SCC52 it was contended that when 6 there is failure on the part … Bench in and by which the High Court has allowed the application filed by the respondent under Section 11 and Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 thereby appointing Mr. J.P. Bansal, retired District Judge
M/s Shree Vishnu Constructions Vs. The Engineer In Chief Military Engi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-09-2023
Singla Constructions (P) Ltd. case [S.P. Singla Constructions (P) Ltd. v. State of H.P., (2019) 2 SCC488: (2019) 1 SCC (Civ) 748]. : (SCC p. 495, para16) “16. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, we … was the case on behalf of the appellant that in view of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “Amendment Act, 2015”) by which Section 11(6A) came to be inserted, while deciding the
The Officer in Charge, Sub Regional Provident Fund Office and Anr. Vs. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5821 OF2019(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.22243 of 2015) The Officer InCharge, SubRegional …Appellants Provident Fund Office & Anr. versus M/s Godavari Garments Limited …Respondent JUDGMENT INDU … The present Civil Appeal has been filed to challenge the Order dated 27.04.2012 passed in W.P. No.1615 of 1993 by the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. 1 2. The background facts in which the present Civil Appeal … 2(f) of the EPF Act. Hence, the Respondent Company 1 (1986) 1 SCC32 5 is liable to pay Provident Fund contribution in respect of those
Sushilaben Indravadan Gandhi Vs. The New India Assurance Company Limit ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-2020
the vehicle turned turtle. The husband of Appellant No.1 was seriously injured and ultimately succumbed to his injuries. 1 3. On 17.04.1997, the Respondent No.3 had entered into a comprehensive Private Car ‘B’ Policy from the New … that the said Doctor was earning an annual income of INR147,000. Following Sarla Verma v. DTC (2009) 6 SCC121 the Tribunal, after considering deductions as well as future prospects, ultimately arrived at an income figure of INR18275
Satish Chander Ahuja Vs. Sneha Ahuja
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-15-2020
paras 12 and 23 and State of W.B. v. Associated Contractors [State of 46 W.B. v. Associated Contractors, (2015) 1 SCC32 , SCC para 14, this Court has held that wherever the expression “means” is followed by the
The State of Jharkhand Vs. M/S Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
Coking Coal Limited vs. Annapurna Construction (2008) 6 SCC732and State of West Bengal and Ors. vs. Associated Contractors (2015) 1 SCC32 4. In Nav Bharat Construction Company (supra), this Court while following a three-Judge Bench judgment in Mcdermott … of this Court in Mcdermott International INC. vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and Others reported in 2005 (10) SCC353 and a two-Judge Bench judgment in State of Rajasthan vs. Nav Bharat Construction Company (2), 2010 (2) SCC182
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free