2011 6 Scc1 - Judgment Search Results
The Singer Company & Anr vs.mohammed Fayaz
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2016
plaintiffs products in Indiawhich includes “MERRITT” products for the period 2008-2012 are as under: Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Sales figures (in INR Thousands)(approx) 4,95,525 7,06,057 11,17,923 11,89,081 15,59,316 7. As per the plaint, the principal … 07 7 MERRITT JAILOR DEVICE8MERRITT TAILOR79875 MASTER9MERRITT10285073 718381 7 8 9 11 MERRITT12MERRITT (LOGO) 247085 718383 11 21 6. As per the plaint, the plaintiffs have been making extensive publicity and advertisement at huge expenditure to promote … & Co. Ltd. Vs. Geoffrey Manner & Co. Pvt. Ltd. (1969) 2 SCC716that:"It is also important that the marks must be compared as whole. It
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
| | | | |61 | |III. |Motion by the respondents, for the review | 20 - 53| 61 - 115| | |of the Second and Third Judges cases. | | | |IV. |Objection by the petitioners, … of judgments reported in the Second Judges case Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (1993) 4 SCC441 (reaffirmed by unanimously by a Bench of 9 Judges in the Third Judges case Special Reference No.1 of
Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-17-2023
violence against the queer community .................................. 11 B. Submissions ............................................................................................... 18 C. Reliefs sought in the proceedings ............................................................ 64 D. Analysis ....................................................................................................... 68 i. This Court is vested with the authority to hear this case ................... 68 … not a constant but is guided by social morality as opposed to 4 (2009) 160 DLT2775 (2014) 1 SCC16 AIR2014SC18637 AIR2017SC41619 PART A constitutional values, and that a section of the population should not remain in a
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mukesh and Anr Vs. State for Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 607-608 OF2017(arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) Nos. 3119-3120 of 2014) Mukesh & Anr. …Appellants Versus State for NCT of
Vikas Yadav Vs. State of U.P and Ors. Etc. Etc
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(2013) 3 SCC440[56]. (2010) 14 SCC641[57]. (2013) 3 SCC294[58]. (2011) 2 SCC123[59]. (2006) 5 SCC475[60]. (2007) 12 SCC654[61]. (2011) 6 SCC405[62]. (2011) 6 SCC396[63]. (2003) 12 SCC199[64]. (2013) 13 SCC1[65]. (2010) 6 SCC1[66]. (2013) 7 SCC54 … such inconsistencies and lamented over the same in the following words in para 52: [Swamy Shraddananda (2) case, SCC p. 790]. “52. The inability of the criminal justice system to deal with all major crimes equally effectively
Union of India Vs. Hardy Exploration and Production (India) Inc
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-01-2018
vs. Ferro Concrete Construction (P) Ltd. (2009) 12 SCC1 Videocon Industries Limited vs. Union of India and Anr. (2011) 6 SCC161 Dozco India Private Ltd. vs. Doosan Infracore Co. Limited (2011) 6 SCC179 Yograj Infrastructure Limited vs. Ssang … (2) Wobben Properties GMBH vs. Enercon (India) Ltd. (2012) EWHC3711(Comm), Govt. of India vs. Petrocon India Ltd. (2016) SCC Online MYFC35 Indian Cases: National Thermal Power Corporation vs. Singer Co. And Ors. (1992) 3 SCC551 Sumitomo Heavy
Krishnamoorthy Vs. Sivakumar and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-2015
the police found certain other facets and eventually placed eight different chargesheets, being C.C. Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate-IV, Coimbatore and the Magistrate had taken cognizance … at Rs.50,000/-. ..........................., J.(Dipak Misra) ..........................., J.(Prafulla C. Pant) New Delhi February 05, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. (2002) 5 SCC294[2]. (2003) 4 SCC399[3]. (1998) 1 SCC226[4]. 1992 Supp (2) SCC651[5]. (1978) 1 SCC405[6]. (1985) 4 SCC628[7]. (1996) 2
Balram Prasad Vs. Kunal Saha and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
application of the claimant for examining foreign experts. Against this order, the claimant preferred SLP (C) No.3173 of 2011 before this Court praying for permission to examine two foreign experts, namely, Prof. John F. Burke Jr. and … | |1. Santosh Devi v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.,|Rs.10,000 | |(2012) 6 SCC421| | |2. New India Assurance Company Limited v. |Rs.10,000 | |Yogesh Devi, … through video conferencing at the expense of the appellant-doctors and the Hospital. The National Commission vide order dated 6.9.2010 dismissed the application of the claimant for examining foreign experts. Against this order, the claimant preferred SLP (C)
Pappu Deo Yadav Vs. Naresh Kumar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-2020
victim is thrust into the world of the disabled, itself most discomfiting and 29 First Schedule, Finance Act, 2011. 30 By applying the ratio in Pranay Sethi. 26 unsettling. If courts nit-pick and award niggardly amounts oblivious … 4. Loss of future earning capacity/ income 11,66,400 5. Loss of amenities and enjoyment of life 15,000 3 6. Compensation for disfigurement 25,000 7. Loss of income during treatment 48,000 8. Future medical expenses 9. TOTAL100,000 14,25,400 … judgments in Pranay Sethi & Ors4 which was later 2 (2017) 16 SCC860 3 (2018) 4 SCC5714 Supra n.2 4 followed in Jagdish5 by a
Kalpana Mehta and Ors. Vs. U.O.I. and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-05-2017
(1973) 4 SCC225[13]. (2014) 9 SCC1[14]. (2009) 10 SCC564[15]. AIR1963SC1241[16]. AIR1981SC1922[17]. AIR1976SC10[18]. AIR1976SC348[19]. AIR1980SC387[20]. (1996) 1 SCC130[21]. (2013) 6 SCC1[22]. (1972) 1 SCC298[23]. (1976) 3 SCC108[24]. (1999) 4 SCC306[25]. [1983]. 2 All ER233[26]. (2013) 16 SCC538[27]. Committee … judicial pronouncements on that question were succinctly analysed by this Court in T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala[29]., SCC paras 29-34. Para 34 of the judgment inter alia reads:“34. … In our view, the courts, civil or
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free