2010 8 Scc206 - Judgment Search Results
Anwar Ali Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-25-2020
is placed upon the decision of this Court in the case of G. Parshwanath v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 8 SCC593(paragraphs 22 to 24). Heavy reliance is also placed on the recent decision of this Court in the … relying upon the decisions of this Court in the cases of Babu v. State of Kerala, (2010) 9 SCC189 Bannareddy v. State of Karnataka (2018) 5 SCC790 State of Rajasthan v. Mukesh Kumar alias Mahesh Dhaulpuria (2019)
Smt Prem Latha Uppal Vs. Canara Bank
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-15-2023
It is further submitted that the expression 'may' used in Regulation 10 of the Regulations has been - 8 - WA No.6228 of 2013 held to be mandatory by this court. It is also submitted that the … 10 - WA No.6228 of 2013 330, 'BONGAIGAON REFINERY & PETROCHEMICAL LIMITED VS. GIRISH CHANDRA SARMA', (2007) 7 SCC206 'ARUN KUMAR ALVA VS. VIJAYA BANK AND OTHERS', (2006) 3 KLJ610and 'DIPANKAR SENGUPTA & ANOTHER VS. UNITED BANK
Dharmarajan Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
and other prosecution witnesses inspire confidence.127. The Supreme Court in Vijay alias Chinee v State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 8 SCC191held, after referring to various decisions, that "the law that emerges on the issue is to the effect … State of Assam v. Upendra Nath Rajkhowa (1975 Crl.L.J.354), State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992 Supp. (1) SCC335, Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi) ((2006) 2 SCC677, Lallan Chaudhary and others v. State of Bihar
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Standing Conference of Public Enterprises vs.govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
including Kunhayammed v State of Kerala, (2000) 6 SCC359and Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd v Commissioner of Customs, (2010) 8 SCC313 The finding, in para 12 of the judgment of this Court in New Delhi General Mazdoor Union … relied upon by Shri Mukhoty on behalf of the workmen, viz., D.S. Nakara v. Union of India[(1983) 1 SCC305 1983 SCC (L&S) 145]. ; Delhi Transport Corpn.v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress [1991 Supp (1) SCC600 1991 SCC (L&S)
Yogesh Singh Vs. Mahabeer Singh and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-20-2016
Goswami Vs. Shiv Kumar Singh & Ors., (2004) 9 SCC186 Vijay @ Chinee Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2010) 8 SCC191 Sampath Kumar Vs. Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri, (2012) 4 SCC124 Shyamal Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal, … under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.13. In Himachal Pradesh Administration Vs. Shri Om Prakash, (1972) 1 SCC249 it was held by this Court as follows:“In appeals against acquittal by special leave under Article 136, this
M/s. Supreme Bhiwandi Wada Manor Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Stat ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-26-2021
been finally stated in the judgment of this Court in Srinivas Gundluri v. SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corpn. [(2010) 8 SCC206: (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 652]. wherein the Court stated that : (SCC p. 218, para23) ―23. …
Kailash Vijayvargiya Vs. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-2023
this Court in the cases of Srinivas Gundluri and others v. SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation, reported in (2010) 8 SCC206 and Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P., reported in (2013) 6 SCC384 the plea that the veracity … Court in the case of Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2014) 2 SCC1and holding that as held by this Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra), the police authority in
Pallichal S.K. Pramod Vs. Oommen Chandy
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
Aziz and another (2013 (2) SCC488, Srinivas Gundluri and others v. Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation and others (2010 (8) SCC206, Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal and others (2004 (7) SCC138, Mohinder Singh v. Gulwant Singh and others … decision reported in Helios and Mathewson Information Technology Ltd. and others v. Rajeev Sawhney and another (2012 (1) SCC699 and contended that if the complaint thus contains assertions with sufficient amount of clarity on facts and events,
Pooja Taneja vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
not the writ petition. Reliance has been placed on Shalini Shayam Shetty & Anr. Vs. Rajendra Shankiar Patil, (2010) 8 SCC329 2. Vide order dated 12th August, 2016, my learned Predecessor called upon the learned counsel for the … 1973 (“the Code”, for short). By placing reliance on Radhey Shyam & Anr. Vs. Chabbi Nath, (2015) 5 SCC423 learned Senior Counsel for the respondent No.5 has challenged the maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226
Chandra Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-09-2014
… Appellant Versus State of Rajasthan …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.1156-1157 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) 3524-3525 of 2010) Abdul Hamid and another … Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan …Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1160 OF2014(Arising out of … ………………………………J.[K.S. Radhakrishnan]. ………………………………J.[Dipak Misra]. New Delhi; May 9, 2014.-.---------------------- [1]. (2000) 1 SCC555[2]. (1991) 3 SCC206[3]. (1997) 1 SCC682[4]. (1996) 8 SCC514[5]. (2000) 1 SCC471[6]. … chartered the path of many an emancipation and conferred on the people the highly cherished fundamental rights; about 8.30 a.m., there was a blast of explosive substances between Gate No.12 and Gate No.13, towards the southern and
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free