Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

2010 3 Scc508 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 2017

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-15-2017

SCC221[31]. (1975) 1 SCC11[32]. 1991 Supp (1) SCC600[33]. (1998) 8 SCC296[34]. (1977) 1 SCC677[35]. (2016) 9 SCC541[36]. AIR1967SC1170[37]. (2010) 3 SCC571[38]. AIR1963SC996[39]. (1988) 2 SCC602[40]. (1984) 2 SCC183[41]. (1998) 4 SCC409[42]. (1991) 4 SCC406[43]. (1995) 2 SCC584[44]. 1994 … p.m. on 21st of April 2017. ........................................J.[DIPAK MISRA]. ........................................J.[AMITAVA ROY]. NEW DELHI FEBRUARY15 2017 ----------------------- [1]. (2016) 9 SCC443[2]. (1980) 3 SCC488[3]. (2012) 13 SCC192[4]. (1978) 4 SCC494[5]. Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. AIR1963SC1295[6]. (1978) 1


Jun 28 2017

Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt Ltd and Ors. Vs.pradeep Kumar Khanna and O ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-28-2017

& Neuro Sciences v. C. Parameshwara [(2005) 2 SCC256 and Vinod Seth v. Devinder Bajaj [(2010) 8 SCC1: (2010) 3 SCC (Civ) 212]. ].. We may summarise them as follows: Mineral is not a (a) Section 151 substantive provision


Jul 02 2019

M/S. Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electy reg.commission .

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-02-2019

and order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (“the Appellate Tribunal” for short) in Appeal No.184 of 2010 dated 07.09.2011 thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present appellant and confirming the judgment and order passed … and confirming the judgment and order passed by the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (“the Commission” for short) dated 31.08.2010.2. The facts in brief giving rise to the present appeal are as under. 2 Respondent No.2, namely, Gujarat … case of Indian Oil Corporation vs. Amritsar Gas Services Ltd., (1991) 1 SCC533and Her Highness Maharani Shanti Devi Gaekwad vs. Savji Haribhai Patel & Ors.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 2019

Bikram Chatterji Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-23-2019

Home Construction Private Limited to the directors without receiving any money from the directors during the Financial Year 2010-11. This seems to be a dubious transaction by the directors of the company in manipulating the accounts in … of is Rs.33.4 crore (Anil Kumar Sharma 8.75 cr + Shiv Priya 24.65 cr) in affidavits filed on 3rd Dec 2018 (Volume -II, Page no 414-415). The Difference was found of from the affidavit file and the


Dec 01 2020

The State Of Jharkhand Vs. Brahmputra Metallics Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-01-2020

deny industrial units of the benefit of the promise held out by the State government. The High 7 (2010) 3 SCC274 8 (2016) 6 SCC766 9 (1979) 2 SCC409 9 PART F Court noted that the benefit was … units of the benefit of the promise held out by the State government. The High 7 (2010) 3 SCC274 8 (2016) 6 SCC766 9 (1979) 2 SCC409 9 PART F Court noted that the benefit was to


Oct 06 2023

Ranjan Kumar Chadha Vs. The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-06-2023

untenable.94. The aforesaid view was affirmed in the case of Ajmer Singh v. State of Haryana reported in (2010) 3 SCC746 wherein while searching the shoulder bag of the accused, some contraband was recovered. This Court held that … case of SK. Raju alias Abdul Haque alias Jagga v. State of West Bengal reported in (2018) 9 SCC708 According to the learned counsel, the ratio of the decision of this Court in SK. Raju (supra) is


Dec 01 2015

Lalaram and Ors. Vs. Jaipur Devt.Auth. and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-01-2015

Chitralekha Vs. State of Mysore & Ors., AIR1964SC1823 Hari Ram and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors., (2010) 3 SCC621 40. Per contra Mr. Sunderam has assertively refuted the status of the circular dated 13.12.2001 as one … this Court in particular in Jaipur Development Authority and Others vs. Vijay Kumar Data & Another (2011) 12 SCC94and in State of Bihar Vs. Kripalu Shankar (1987) 3 SCC34 the Division Bench entered a finding on the


Aug 14 2019

Cdr. S. P . Puri (Retd.) Sole Proprietor M/S Spiral Services vs.agricu ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-2019

on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Super Highway Services & Anr., (2010) 3 SCC321 he submits that in the present case termination of the Agreement had serious business consequences on the … on the following judgments:  Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors., (1991) 1 SCC212  ABL International Ltd. & Anr. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors., (2004) 3


Aug 14 2019

Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs.cdr. s.p.puri (Retd.)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-2019

on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Super Highway Services & Anr., (2010) 3 SCC321 he submits that in the present case termination of the Agreement had serious business consequences on the … on the following judgments:  Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors., (1991) 1 SCC212  ABL International Ltd. & Anr. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors., (2004) 3


Jun 28 2024

Sri A Ramesh Babu Vs. Smt Dharani S

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-28-2024

is always viewed seriously. (Vide Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy [Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy, (2010) 8 SCC383: (2010) 3 SCC (Civ) 368 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 878]. .) 18. However, the question does arise as to whether … v. G. Narasimha Reddy [Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy, (2010) 8 SCC383: (2010) 3 SCC (Civ) 368 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 878]. .) 18. However, the question does arise as to whether it is permissible for a party


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial