2009 5 Scc713 - Judgment Search Results
Mukesh and Anr Vs. State for Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-2017
SCC682[269]. [270]. (1975) 3 SCC37[271]. [272]. (1976) 1 SCC163[273]. [274]. (2003) 8 SCC93[275]. [276]. (2005) 10 SCC322[277]. [278]. (2009) 5 SCC740[279]. [280]. (2009) 6 SCC498[281]. [282]. (2010) 1 SCC58[283]. [284]. (2011) 2 SCC764[285]. [286]. (2012) 4 SCC107[287]. [288]. … concern over the increasing crime against women, in State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh and Others (1996) 2 SCC384 this Court held as under:- “21. Of late, crime against women in general and rape in particular is
Manoj Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-20-2022
39), Allaudin Mian v. State of Bihar (1989) 3 SCC5(para 10), Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod v. State of Gujarat (2009) 5 SCC740(para 106), Rajesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2011) 13 SCC706(para 52), Mukesh vv. State (NCT of … and fair appreciation of all the evidence and material on the record. Analysis and Findings 26 (2011) 2 SCC198(para22) 37 I. Neha’s arrest 68. PW-28 (Vijay Singh Chauhan) deposed that he saw Neha loitering suspiciously at 6.00
Sukhdev Yadav Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
SCC37 Chatar Singh v. State of M.P.; (1988) 4 SCC183 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain v. Collector of Customs and (2009) 5 SCC238 State of Punjab v. Madan Lal and drew the attention of the court to the tender age … murder.‖ (emphasis added) We think that it is time that the course suggested in Dalbir Singh [(1979) 3 SCC745:1979. SCC (Cri) 848]. should receive a formal recognition by the Court.57. As a matter of fact there are
18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Vs. Vikas Yadav and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
SCC37 Chatar Singh v. State of M.P.; (1988) 4 SCC183 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain v. Collector of Customs and (2009) 5 SCC238 State of Punjab v. Madan Lal and drew the attention of the court to the tender age … murder.‖ (emphasis added) We think that it is time that the course suggested in Dalbir Singh [(1979) 3 SCC745:1979. SCC (Cri) 848]. should receive a formal recognition by the Court.57. As a matter of fact there are
Vikas Yadav Vs. State of Up
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
SCC37 Chatar Singh v. State of M.P.; (1988) 4 SCC183 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain v. Collector of Customs and (2009) 5 SCC238 State of Punjab v. Madan Lal and drew the attention of the court to the tender age … murder.‖ (emphasis added) We think that it is time that the course suggested in Dalbir Singh [(1979) 3 SCC745:1979. SCC (Cri) 848]. should receive a formal recognition by the Court.57. As a matter of fact there are
State Vs. Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
SCC37 Chatar Singh v. State of M.P.; (1988) 4 SCC183 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain v. Collector of Customs and (2009) 5 SCC238 State of Punjab v. Madan Lal and drew the attention of the court to the tender age … murder.‖ (emphasis added) We think that it is time that the course suggested in Dalbir Singh [(1979) 3 SCC745:1979. SCC (Cri) 848]. should receive a formal recognition by the Court.57. As a matter of fact there are
Vishal Yadav Vs. State Govt. of Up
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
SCC37 Chatar Singh v. State of M.P.; (1988) 4 SCC183 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain v. Collector of Customs and (2009) 5 SCC238 State of Punjab v. Madan Lal and drew the attention of the court to the tender age … murder.‖ (emphasis added) We think that it is time that the course suggested in Dalbir Singh [(1979) 3 SCC745:1979. SCC (Cri) 848]. should receive a formal recognition by the Court.57. As a matter of fact there are
Nilam Katara Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
SCC37 Chatar Singh v. State of M.P.; (1988) 4 SCC183 Mohd. Akhtar Hussain v. Collector of Customs and (2009) 5 SCC238 State of Punjab v. Madan Lal and drew the attention of the court to the tender age … murder.‖ (emphasis added) We think that it is time that the course suggested in Dalbir Singh [(1979) 3 SCC745:1979. SCC (Cri) 848]. should receive a formal recognition by the Court.57. As a matter of fact there are
Divine Infracon Pvt Ltd vs.vistar Constructions Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
amount to sitting in appeal. As held by this Court in Kwality Mfg. Corpn. v. Central Warehousing Corpn. [(2009) 5 SCC142: (2009) 2 SCC (Civ) 406]. the Court while considering challenge to arbitral award does not sit in
Gurnam Singh (D) by Lrs.. Vs. Lehna Singh(d) by Lrs.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-13-2019
even as repeatedly observed by this Court and even in the case of Narayanan Rajendran v. Lekshmy Sarojini, (2009) 5 SCC264 despite the catena of decisions of this Court and even the mandate under Section 100 of the … upon the decisions of this Court in the case of Panchugopal Barua v. Umesh Chandra Goswami, (1997) 4 SCC713 Kondiba Dagadu Kadam v. Savitribai Sopan Gujar, (1999) 3 SCC722 Ishwar Dass Jain v. Sohan Lal, (2000) 1
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free