2003 7 Scc532 - Judgment Search Results

Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru Vs. Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... and centre for public interest litigation vs union of india 2003 7 scc532 the hon ble supreme court has further discussed about the ..... had been deleted from government notification dated 30 04 2003 01 05 2003 as a notified institution further the government order also ..... of attorney holder challenging government notification dated 30 04 2003 01 05 2003 issued by the state government in so far it .....

Balaraj Jadhav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... judicial pronouncement rendered by the supreme court of india reported at 2003 7 scc532 centre for public interest litigation v union of india anr ..... contentions the same consequently deserves to be considered in some detail 7 our attention has been drawn to the following provisions of ..... and and institutions and w p c no 11837 2015 page 7 of 38 medical benefit is extended to their families their .....

Mrs.G.Pravina Vs. Shri.Narendra Modi

Court : Chennai

..... 1 scc226 centre for public interest litigation v union of india 2003 7 scc532 rajiv ranjan singh quot lalan quot viii v union of india ..... stated supra are reproduced hereunder complaint letter wednesday 23 april 2014 7 22 pm from dr g pravina narayani sungpravina yahoo com ..... by the matters in question interest shared by national government quot 7 in janata dal case supra this court considered the scope .....

Munna Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3805; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)991; 2003CriLJ4440; 106(2003)DLT592(SC); JT2003(7)SC361; 2003(6)SCALE698; (2003)10SCC599

supreme court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position in

Jai Shree Yadav Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)627; JT2004(6)SC519; 2004(6)SCALE587; (2005)9SCC788

supreme court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position for an offence under section 307 read with section 149 7 years ri and for an offence under section 504 ipc

State of Punjab Vs. Ram Pal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(14)SC165; 2009(5)SCALE556; (2009)5SCC565:2009AIRSCW4749

in madan lal and anr v state of h p 2003crilj3868 but the respondent is not represented and therefore we deem is a state of mind which is deliberate or intended 7 as noted in gunwantlal v state of m p possession

Tma Pai Foundation and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1993(4)SCALE368; (1994)2SCC195

supreme court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position in

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

scc 732 union of india v rajesh p u puthuvalnikathu 2003 7 scc 285 secretary state of karnataka and ors v invited to the terms and conditions at annexure 1 page 77 in the paper book of this writ petition to submit

Saleem Vs. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1998(6)SC503; 1998(5)SCALE360; (1998)7SCC242; [1998]Supp1SCR625

supreme court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position ii and the annual value of the same was rs 72 and house and land tax was rs 2 52 paise

Hindustan Machine Tools and ors. Vs. M. Rangareddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3287; [2000(87)FLR793]; (2001)ILLJ596SC; 2000(6)SCALE614; (2000)7SCC741; (2001)1UPLBEC70

supreme court in madan lal v state of h p 2003 7 scc 465 however high court not keeping correct position a permanent nature and their services cannot be dispensed with 7 we have carefully considered the contentions raised by learned counsel