2003 7 Scc532 - Judgment Search Results

Bombay Metal Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Tara Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(33)PTC63(Bom)

for arguments on 21st march 2003 order dated 21 03 2003petitioner has filed the present petition alleging disobedience and non compliance parties be present in person adjourned to 23 05 2003 7 it is apparent from the above interim orders that the

The Bombay Metal Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Tara Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 131(2006)DLT327

days parties be present in person adjourned to 23 05 2003 7 it is apparent from the above interim orders that parties be present in person adjourned to 23 05 2003 7 it is apparent from the above interim orders that the

Salim Akbarali Nanji Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2218; 2006(3)AWC3053(SC); II(2006)BC334(SC); [2006]131CompCas675(SC); JT2006(5)SC587; 2006(3)KLT6(SC); (2006)4MLJ167(SC); 2006(5)SCALE606; (2006)5SCC302; [2006]68S

psbs 1036 16 01 132 2002 03 dated march 3 2003 7 it was further explained that the write off is 1036 16 01 132 2002 03 dated march 3 2003 7 it was further explained that the write off is an

Sci (India) Limited Vs. the Bihar State Financial Corporation and ors.

Court : Patna

00 27 3 2003 5 00 000 00 1 9 2003 6 70 872 52 21 8 2003 28 733 00 6 70 880 00 20 days 1 3 2002 6 70 880 00 30 3 2002 6 70 880 00 29

Manilal Keshri and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

and submitted chargesheet no 44 of 2002 on 27 03 2003 against vijay kumar sao and sanjay kumar sao cognizance was without any notice and filed a counter affidavit in paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit it has been admitted by the

Gtcl Mobile-com Technology Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. an ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR490; 2006(44)MhLj11

of the appellate tribunal heard the matter on 1 12 2003 and dismissed the appeal against the order dated 14 11 drt during the period between 22 10 1999 to 15 7 2005 could not proceed consequential submission being that if the

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2751; 2006(3)AWC2128(SC); 2006(4)BomCR694; 2006(2)CTLJ111(SC); 2006(5)SCALE44; (2006)10SCC510

had been paid pursuant to the order dated 3 9 2003 passed by the high court and as such the balance furnished a bank guarantee to the tune of rs 9 75 crores after the completion of the term of one year

W. Kumar Singh Vs. Commissioner/Secretary (Cada) Govt. of Manipur and ...

Court : Guwahati

with the mpsc in its meeting held on 15 12 2003 but the recommendation of the private respondent no as a the apex court and the findings are at paras 6 7 8 accordingly paras 2 6 7 and 8 of the

Hotel and Restaurant Assocn. and anr. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1168; (2007)1CompLJ46(SC); 2006(12)SCALE543; 2007[5]STR161

to the rates of similar channels as on 26 12 2003 provided further that in case a multi system operator or increase 4 of the enhanced charges i e ceiling charges 7 again on account of inflation indisputably however the operation of

Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. Vs. Goa Golf Club Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR640

petitioner reliance is also placed on letter dated 16 3 2003 exh j written by the respondent to the petitioner the of the respondent which shows that income tax of rs 73 837 was paid on a sum of rs 7 23