2003 7 Scc532 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2003 7 scc532 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel appellate jurisdiction Page 1 of about 150 results (0.145 seconds)M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
or seek exemption under section 13 of the electricity act 2003 the chief electrical inspector further directed the appellant that till the provisions of the electricity act 2003 including section 61 79 4 and 86 4 vi the honble supreme court in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEast Coast Railway Rail Sadan, Chandrasekharpur Vs. Odisha Electricity ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
filed this petition under section 120 of the electricity act 2003 seeking review of the judgment dated 29 1 2014 passed 2009 gujarat electricity regulatory commission vs century rayon in para 74 thereof has held as under oelig 74 summary of our
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd and Others Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Re ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
iii of the rerc distribution licensees standard of performance regulations 2003 which reads as under oelig in case burning of the the cost of meter to be charged from the consumer 7 according to shri c k rai there is no provision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Hindalco Industries Limited Mumbai Vs. the Uttar Pradesh Electric ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
object of section 86 1 e by the electricity act 2003 the relevant extracts of the judgment are as under aluminimum plant in addition to above captive power plant of 742 mw the appellant has also set up a co generation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter Of: Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation L ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
us now examine section 79 1 of the electricity act 2003 19 section 79 1 of the electricity act 2003 the matters connected with clauses a to d of section 79 1 of the act the matter of dispute in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. S N J Sugars and Products Limited Formerly Known as M/S. Sagar Su ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
the price of power supplied during the period 13 01 2003 to 21 01 2004 and thereafter and in accordance with for setting up of power plant and obtained approval on 7 4 2000 c in pursuance of the same the appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. (Formerly Uttar Pradesh State Ele ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
22 of 2011 under section 111 of the electricity act 2003 whereby the respondent no 1 central electricity regulatory commission hereinafter for the period 1 4 2009 to 31 3 2014 7 since the licence fee has been a new component of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShree Cement Limited Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission V ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
and violative of section 62 4 of the electricity act 2003 as similarly placed consumers getting the entire quantum from the in view of the maximum demand defined in regulation 2 7 of the rerc electricity supply code and connected matters regulations
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTamil Nadu Electricity Consumersâandeuro;andtrade; Association (Repre ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
of consumers of tangedco section 86 1 e of the 2003 act empowers the state commission to specify purchase of electricity paper e the state commission issued the impugned order dated 7 3 2013 notifying the various procedures and modalities for administration
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBihar Industries Association Sinha Library Road Vs. Bihar Electricity ...
Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
the provisions of section 62 3 of the electricity act 2003 we observe that the learned state commission has taken the is reduced to rs 595 66 crore against rs 3427 72 crore projected by bsphcl in order to avoid tariff shock
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT