20 2 - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Magnum Trading Corporation and Another Vs. Ito Ward 20(2)(2) and ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

common order, we shall dispose off three appeals – i.e. two filed by the assessee relevant to A.Ys 2004-05 and 2006-07 respectively and one filed by the revenue relevant to A.Y. 2006-07. For the sake of convenience … common order, we shall dispose off three appeals – i.e. two filed by the assessee relevant to A.Ys 2004-05 and 2006-07 respectively and one filed by the revenue relevant to A.Y. 2006-07. For the sake of convenience

Ttk Pharma Ltd., Jeedimetla Vs. Authority Under the Munimun Wages Act ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD479; 1999(6)ALT792; (2000)ILLJ966AP

of wages to be paid to those workmen at Rs.2,90,111.50 ps. as provided under sub-section (3) of Section 20 of the Act. The Labour Officer-cum-Inspector under the Act filed an application before the Minimum Wages Authority, the