20 1 And 2 - Judgment Search Results

Louis Mathew Vs. State Information Commissioner, Office of the Kerala ...

Court: Kerala

by the 4th respondent by which decision has been taken to initiate proceedings against the petitioner under Section 20(1)(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') alleging that false information had

Balamurugan Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police and Another

Court: Chennai Madurai

that even when an express Notification is issued by the State Government, in exercise of powers under Section 20(1) and (2) of the Code, read with Section 18 of the Act of 1956, can such Notification be overlooked?

R. Laxminarayana Vs. B. Ramya

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD767; 2003(3)ALT185

the Court to proceed with the matter further, the matter is being referred to the Lok Adalat. Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 dealing with Cognizance of cases by Lok Adalats reads as hereunder:(1) … ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The petitioner/husband filed Transfer C.M.P. under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for transfer of O.P. No.260/2000 from the file of Family Judge,

Bayya Pitchaiah Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1969]24STC390(AP)

Act. Section 20 deals with revision by the Board of Revenue, and other prescribed authorities, and is as follows:'20 (1): The Board of Revenue may suo motu call for and examine the record of any order passed or … to them.(3) In relation to an order of assessment passed under this Act, the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be exercisable only within such period not exceeding four years from the date on which the order

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Itc Bhadrachalam Paper Boards Ltd., Sarpak ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)ALD31; 1999(1)ALT704

petitioner, as per the provisions of Section 20(3) of the APGST Act, the power of revision under Section 20( 1) and (2) of the said Act can be exercised only within such period not exceeding four years and therefore, the … to the interests of the revenue, yet the third respondent exercised his suo motu revisional powers under Section 20(1) and (2) of the APGST Act, at the instance of the first respondent-assesses after a lapse of four years from

Boricha Valabhai Nathubhai Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1988CriLJ281; (1987)2GLR1230

the same offence. With a view to attracting applicability of Article 20 of the Constitution of India Clauses (1) and (2), the fundamental conditions are:(1) There must have been a previous prosecution;(2) Accused must have been punished at such

K. Basavarajappa Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1997)138CTR(SC)202

the tax authorities as because of such an agreement which was violative of provisions of r. 16 sub-r. (1) and r. 51 r/w r. 48 the appellant could not be said to be a person having any legal … of its dues and consequently even though any transaction which was hit by the provisions of rr. 16(1) and (2), the parties to such transaction would have sufficient interest to move an application under r. 60 for setting … said defaulter Shri Y. S. Devendra Murthy entered into an agreement dt. 20th Nov., 1982 with the common appellant to sell his property being agricultural

Heera Lal Vs. Mandir Shri Thakurji Sangria and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2005(2)Raj1114; 2005(2)WLC799

holding that the provisions of sub Section (5) of Section 13 are mandatory in nature?3. The Questions No. 1 and 4 aforesaid relate to the aspect of striking out of defence of the defendant-appellant whereas Question No. 2 … note to that effect. Eviction was claimed on the grounds that: (a) the defendant has paid rent of 20 1/2 months upto 15.10.1976 amounting to Rs. 1640/- on 19.7.1978 under receipt but the defendant has neither tendered

Shri Mohan S/O. Gopalrao Mate Vs. Principal Secretary, Urban Developme ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR41; 2009(1)BomCR275; (2008)110BOMLR2696

the lands and were legally granted exemption to hold vacant lands in excess of the ceiling limit Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ULC Act', which has … 12.4.2007 as the cut-off date for taking action under the impugned Govt. Resolution. The exemption orders under Section 20(1)(a) as per existing policy of Government have already been granted and acted upon and the Schemes are completed

Dr. Sukhdev Singh Gambhir S/O Shri Jawahar Singh Gambhir Vs. Amrit Pal ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(106)DRJ574

other. Respondent No. 3, Sh. Jawahar Singh Gambhir, is the father of the appellant and the respondents No. 1 and 2. The appellant and the respondents No. 1 and 2 are brothers.b. The Respondent No. 3 was the absolute … Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 07th August, 2006 delivered by the learned Single Judge declaring the plaintiff-appellant to be the owner of 1/4th share of the