2 H - Judgment Search Results
Executive Engineer, Shimla Electrical Division No. Ii, H.P.S.E.B., Shi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-09-2000
Reported in: [2000(87)FLR289]; JT2000(10)SC357; (2000)IILLJ1132SC
interference is called for in the present proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.2. Respondent No. 2 who was admittedly sent for apprenticeship training as a Lineman in 1982, successfully completed the said training in … ORDER1. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, we do not think on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the
Harish Chand Arora Son of Khilanda Ram Resident of 5-e/23 Nit, Vs. Lac ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
son of Khilanda Ram, resident of 5-E/23, NIT, Faridabad....Appellant. versus Lachhman Dass son of Thana Ram, resident of 2-H/80, Bunglow Plot, NIT, Faridabad....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. None
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. 1. S. R. Patton. (i. T. R. No. 173 of 1 ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-15-1989
Reported in: (1992)92CTR(Ker)197; [1992]193ITR49(Ker); [1992]65TAXMAN472(Ker)
the decisions in CIT v. Joy P. Jacob : [1985]151ITR19(Ker) and Oommen Punnoose v. Koruthu Koruthu [1951] KLT 223, in furtherance of the plea that the Explanation was inserted only by way of abundant caution and that … J. - These are connected cases. The Revenue is the applicant at whose instance two questions of law have been referred for the decision on this court in each of these cases. They are as follows :Income-tax
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free