2 And 4 - Judgment Search Results

The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-2(4), vs M/S. Unis ...

Court: Karnataka

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HEMANT VENKATRAY PAI A/W SMT. LOCHANA S. BABU, ADVOCATES) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKAHIGH COURT ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERPASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL NO. 65

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-2(4), vs Mrs. K.B. Bhojam ...

Court: Karnataka

JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) The above writ appeal is a part of a batch of writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 directed against the learned Single Judge’sorder dated 01.12.2025 in W.P.No.35585/2025 allowingthe … -1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL NO.386 OF

M/S the Hamlet, vs the Income Tax Officer Ward - 6(2)(4)

Court: Karnataka

ABOUT 41 YEARS High Court of Karnataka SON OF LATE SRI SUBHASH BAGARIA …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHREEHARI KUTSA.,ADVOCATE) -2- AND: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 6(2)(4) 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560095.

Naurata Ram (Since Deceased) Through His Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward-i ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has not attained finality, the petitioners cannot be assessed to income tax. It is further Kumar Naresh N 2013.09.16 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.2513

Date of Decision:2.4.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.23586 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23586 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:2.4.2014

Palmtrade Services P. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(2)(4 ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

the IT Rules, 1962. Accordingly, the issue raised in ground no.1 is partly allowed. 5. Grounds no.2, 3 and 4 are interconnected. Referring to these grounds, Ld Counsel mentioned that if the said additional evidences are admitted, they

Binny Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cwt, Central Circle Ii(4)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in: (2005)96ITD500(Chennai)

bring monies to rehabilitate the company. Such proposal was initially rejected by the BIFR by its order dated 24-2-2003 against which an appeal was filed before the appellate authority, which also confirmed the rejection. Further appeal was … in force in the area in which such land is situated. He further submitted that according to sections 48 and 49 of The Tamil Nadu Town & Country Planning Act, 1971 wherein it specifically provided that no

Shree Parleshwar Co-op. Housing Vs. Ito, Ward 21(2)(4), Mumbai

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)8SOT668(Mum.)

filed by the assessee against the consolidated order of the Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2001-02 involve some common grounds, Therefore, we proceed to dispose of these appeals by this consolidated order for the … High Court decision in the case of CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakar Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2000) 245 ITR 498 (Bom). The learned counsel pleaded that the said decision of the Bombay High Court has already been overruled