2 6 - Judgment Search Results
Ambika Agro Suppliers Vs. Ito, Wd. 2(6), Jalgaon
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on: Mar-30-2004
Reported in: (2005)95ITD326(Pune.)
explanation accepted without making relevant enquiryInvoking section 263 the CIT set aside assessment order on not making proper and relevant enquiries by the AO on issues, … with the return of income, it was mentioned by the assessee that the payments are covered under rule 6DD and as per Boards Circular No. 220 the payments are made to the parties, where the assessee has
M.A.A. Raoof Vs. Income-tax Officer, Company Circle Ii(6), Madras and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-14-1983
Reported in: [1985]152ITR228(Mad)
under law. As there was no response from the first respondent, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. The petitioner appeared in person and the substance of his argument as could he gathered from the affidavit, … Venkataswami, J.1. The petitioner was the winner of a jackpot ticket in the Madras Race Course on September 6,1981. The dividend was Rs. 9,361 out of which the second respondent deducted a sum of Rs. 3,040 towards
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free