2 6 - Judgment Search Results

Ambika Agro Suppliers Vs. Ito, Wd. 2(6), Jalgaon

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2005)95ITD326(Pune.)

explanation accepted without making relevant enquiryInvoking section 263 the CIT set aside assessment order on not making proper and relevant enquiries by the AO on issues, … with the return of income, it was mentioned by the assessee that the payments are covered under rule 6DD and as per Boards Circular No. 220 the payments are made to the parties, where the assessee has

Sri Siddalingeshwara Graphics vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commerc ...

Court: Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 8185 OF 2025 (T-RES) … shall afford a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and hear him and proceed further in accordance with law. vi) It is made clear that if he does not appear on 28.04.2025 and does not file objections along

M.A.A. Raoof Vs. Income-tax Officer, Company Circle Ii(6), Madras and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1985]152ITR228(Mad)

under law. As there was no response from the first respondent, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. The petitioner appeared in person and the substance of his argument as could he gathered from the affidavit, … Venkataswami, J.1. The petitioner was the winner of a jackpot ticket in the Madras Race Course on September 6,1981. The dividend was Rs. 9,361 out of which the second respondent deducted a sum of Rs. 3,040 towards