2 5 - Judgment Search Results
The Chirayinkeezhu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. No.1155 vs the Incom ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-15-2024
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 10742 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: THE CHIRAYINKEEZHU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.1155 REPRESENTED
Date of Decision : 2.5.2013 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.not M-8765 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision :2. 5.2013 Angrej Singh @ Pappu ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM :
Date of Decision:2.5.2015 Vs. Gulzar Singh Petitioner
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3066 of 2014 Date of Decision:2.5.2015 Gulzar Singh Petitioner Versus Harbans Singh Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajiv Narain Raina Present: Mr.Rajesh
18-section briefs on any result in this list
T.U. Khatri, Residing at 2/5 Yeshwant Nagar, Goregaon (West) Bombay-40 ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-05-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Bom268; 2002(3)ALLMR27; 2002(4)BomCR733; (2002)3BOMLR847
R.M. Lodha, J.1 .Whether there is anything wrong in thedecision dated 24th April, 1990 taken by theInstitute of Company Secretaries of India not toallow the Advocates to practise as CompanySecretaries … pursuing the profession of CompanySecretary in practice simultaneously.17. Not long time back, the Apex Court in(Dr.) Haniraj L.Chulani v. Bar Council ofMaharashtra and Goa : AIR1996SC1708 held thatthe Rules framed by Bar Council of Maharashtra andGoa restricting
Bharatkumar Chinubhai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat. Commiss ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-02-1968
Reported in: [1969]71ITR1(Guj)
Income-tax Reference No. 9 of 1967 and then proceed to examine the question arising in Wealth-tax Reference No. 5 of 1967.I.T. Reference No. 9 of 1967 : One Chinubhai, his wife, Shantaben, his son, Bharatkumar, who is … Income-tax Officer assessing the income for the assessment year 1960-61, the relevant year of account being Samvat year 2015, took the view that, on the death Shantaben, her undivided half share in the properties of the Hindu
Mohd. Atiq Vs. Income-tax Officer, District Ii (V), Kanpur.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-03-1961
Reported in: [1962]46ITR452(All)
This is a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution.The prayer contained in the petition is that a writ of certiorari may be issued quashing … writ of certiorari may be issued quashing the order dated January 15, 1959, whereby a penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed upon the petitioner.The material facts were, that the petitioner was a partner in the firm, Eastern
Shamsher Bahadur Mirhoutra Vs. Income-tax Officer, Distt. Ii (V), Kanp ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-13-1962
Reported in: [1963]50ITR156(All)
recovery certificate sent by the Income-tax Officer and the proceedings thereunder. It was again pointed out in paragraph 5 of annexure 'S' to the, Collector, Dehra Dun, that the proceedings were clearly barred by time provided by … This is a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution directed against the notice of demand dated March 17, 1955, and the recovery certificates dated
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free