2 4 - Judgment Search Results

Naurata Ram (Since Deceased) Through His Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward-i ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has not attained finality, the petitioners cannot be assessed to income tax. It is further Kumar Naresh N 2013.09.16 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.2513

Date of Decision:2.4.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.23586 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23586 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:2.4.2014

Palmtrade Services P. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(2)(4 ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

D. Karunakara Rao, AM: 1. This appeal filed by the assessee on 24.10.2011 is against the order of the CIT (A)-17, Mumbai dated 19.8.2011 for the assessment year 2008-2009. 2. In … 3.1. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the ad-hoc disallowance of Rs. 35,506/- out of traveling expenses. 4.1. The Ld CIT (A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 1,00,000/- made by the AO u/s 68

Binny Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cwt, Central Circle Ii(4)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in: (2005)96ITD500(Chennai)

bring monies to rehabilitate the company. Such proposal was initially rejected by the BIFR by its order dated 24-2-2003 against which an appeal was filed before the appellate authority, which also confirmed the rejection. Further appeal was … in force in the area in which such land is situated. He further submitted that according to sections 48 and 49 of The Tamil Nadu Town & Country Planning Act, 1971 wherein it specifically provided that no

Shree Parleshwar Co-op. Housing Vs. Ito, Ward 21(2)(4), Mumbai

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)8SOT668(Mum.)

filed by the assessee against the consolidated order of the Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2001-02 involve some common grounds, Therefore, we proceed to dispose of these appeals by this consolidated order for the … High Court decision in the case of CIT v. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakar Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2000) 245 ITR 498 (Bom). The learned counsel pleaded that the said decision of the Bombay High Court has already been overruled