2 3 - Judgment Search Results

Shiv Shakti Textile Industries Vs. Cce-ii/iii

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2005)(121)LC184Tri(Bang.)alore

Bhilwara Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur and in the case of R.M. Gupta Textiles P. Ltd. v. CCE, Hyderabad-II- 2000 (122) ELT 129 : 2000 (92) ECR 492 (T). It is also submitted that the findings recorded by … prayed for re-determination of the Annual Capacity of Production as the same was fixed in terms of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act. He had also asked for refund of the amount. It was his connection

A.D. Choubey Vs. Ito, Ward-2(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur

Reported in: (2006)98ITD57Jab

3 and further challenged confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 3,600 as electricity payment by raising identical ground Nos. 2 and 4.These cases involve identical facts, similar issues and were heard together, as such are being disposed of

Bio Pharma Vs. Ito, Ward-2(3), Baroda

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2006)5SOT478(Ahd.)

Civil Court cancelling the transaction of transfer of an industrial undertaking from the assessee to Century Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 3. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in rejecting the alternative contention of the assessee that even if the court decree … (Appeals) erred in upholding the decision of the assessing officer to tax the short-term capital gain of Rs. 2,03,50,292 in the hands of the assessee.2. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in holding that the assessing officer was justified

Gaurav Dalmia vs Deputy Director of Income Tax Investigation Unit 2 (3 ...

Court: Delhi

GAURAV DALMIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Kumar and Ms. Shagun Chopra, Advs.versusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INVESTIGATION UNIT 2 (3) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and

Nambiath Raman Velayudhan vs the Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3)

Court: Kerala

WARD 2(3) AAYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHAKTHAN THAMPURAN 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, NO.46, SAKTHAN THAMURAN3 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTAN THAMURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 10036 OF 2023 PETITIONER: NAMBIATH RAMAN VELAYUDHAN AGED

Mohammed Musthafa C.K vs Income Tax Officer , Ward 2(3)

Court: Kerala

RESPONDENTS: 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AAYAKAR BHAVAN,MANANCHIRA, 3 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS CENTRE, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001. 4 TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, AAYAKAR … COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 PETITIONER: MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA C. K., AGED 50 YEARS, PARAKKOT PATTAYI HOUSE, FEROKE P. O.,KOZHIKODE,

V. Parvathalu S/O. Mallaiah, H.No.2-3-19 Vs. the Municipal Council, Ka ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

M. Rama Rao Counsel for the respondent: Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna : ?Citations:1. 1979(1) aplj PG 14.2. AIR 198.AP 2.3. 1990 (2) ALT 20.D.B. ORDER: This writ petition is instituted by a practitioner of law, challenging the legality

Date of Decision: 2.3.2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

M-32003 o”1. In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … Crl. Misc. not M-32003 of 2011 Date of decision:2. 3.2013 Ajit Singh @ Jeet Singh and others ...Petitioners . Versus State of Punjab and

Hdfc Bank Limited Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 2(3) an ...

Court: Mumbai

the consent of Counsel and at their request the Petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2 The Petitioner is in challenge to an order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - 2(3), Mumbai

Collusion Between Respondents No.1 and 2 (iii) there Is a Fundamental ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?. 2. To be referred to reporters or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. * * * Present: Mr.Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for … IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3006 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 05.08.2014 M/s Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd......Appellant(s) Versus Sh. Gian Singh & anr......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE