1995 2 Scc 648 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1995 2 scc 648 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 301 results (0.229 seconds)M/S Spray Engineering Sugars Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporatio ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... docket in m s isha marbles versus bihar state electricity board 1995 2 scc 648 the supreme court held that in the absence of any statutory ..... board versus m s hanuman rice mills dhanauri ors 2010 9 scc 145 the supreme court considered isha marbles case and distinguished between ..... nigam ltd versus m s paramount polymers pvt ltd 2006 13 scc 101 the supreme court discussed the earlier judgment in isha .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurbux Singh Through L.Rs. and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana
Court : Punjab and Haryana
the appellants 12 in buta singh v union of india 1995 5 scc 283 constitution bench of five hon ble judges a wide open area of 23 acres acquired for college 2 the shops constructed for the commercial purpose in sector 13 ranvir singh and anr v union of india 2005 12 scc 59 it was observed in para 36 36 furthermore a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTController of Estate Duty Vs. Kismat Rai Khanna
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1998)146CTR(P& H)75; [1998]234ITR179(P& H)
1995 214 itr 566 and s s mehta s case 1995 214 itr 648 raj and the gujarat high court in the first appellate authority who deleted the addition of rs 27 625 made in the estate for aggregation purposes it was 566 and s s mehta s case 1995 214 itr 648 raj and the gujarat high court in gunvantlal keshavlal s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Punjab Vs. Jaswant Singh and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1996)114PLR90
singh and anr v the state of punjab and ors 1995 2 110 p l r 100 16 in the collector balwant singh and ors j t 1995 6 s c 218 tarlochan singh and anr v the state of punjab and 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 and 660 of 1989 for restoration of the award of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Sarup and Another Vs. DIn Dayal
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1997P& H1
supreme court in wazir chand v swarankar sabha 1990 hrr 200 and shadi singh v rakha 1992 2 102 pun lr motor general traders v state of andhra pradesh 1984 1 scc222 air 1984 sc 121 it was submitted that the fact m s associated publishers madras ltd 1990 2 ren cr 648 a three judges bench of the supreme court again considered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovt. of Manipur Vs. State of Punjab and Another
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1997P& H28
the reasons recorded in the said order cwp 9052 of 1995 was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition is pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause state of haryana v m s suman enterprises 1994 4 scc 217 wherein their lordships spelt out the attributes of a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharanjit Singh Vs. Satwant Kaur
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : I(2001)DMC139
all india hindu law reporter 531 niranjan kutnarv veena rani 1995 1 all india hindu law reporter 123 suresh kumar batra itself both the parties i e petitioner nos 1 and 2 admitted their signatures on petition under section 13b of the sc gurdhiana singh v gurmeet kaur 1996 3 114 plr 648 krishna kumari v ashwani kumar 1996 3 114 plr 414
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagtar Singh Etc. Vs. State of Punjab Etc.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
been reiterated in awadh bihari yadav v state of bihar 1995 6 scc 31 u p jal nigam v kalra properties 5 scc 622 state of maharashtra vs b e billimoria 2003 7 scc 336 and dev sharan vs state of u scc 745 bangalore development authority v r hanumaiah 2005 12 scc 508 and hari ram v state of haryana 2010 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Bharat Wools, Ludhiana Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1996P& H215; (1996)113PLR230
education and research centre 1995 4 jt sc 366 air 1995 sc 1811 and the consumer education and research centre v aforesaid acts and incorporate appropriate provisions in the notification dated 24 11 1992 before allotment of plots is made 27 before in union of india v hindustan development corporation 1993 3 scc 499 air 1994 sc 988 the supreme court considered the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKailash Devi Wife of Jai Kishan Vs. Jai Kishan (Lance Naik) Son of Pho ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2004)138PLR537
a planted story by the respondent husband with respondent no 2 the respondent husband it is stated wanted to get rid the case of parveen mehta v inderjit mehta7 2002 5 scc 706 besides mental cruelty is a state of mind and scott described in loveden v loveden 1810 161 e r 648 d as the guarded discretion of a reasonable and just
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT