1995 2 Scc 648 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1995 2 scc 648 Court: mumbai goa Page 1 of about 300 results (0.19 seconds)Madan Malji Kambli and Others Vs. State of Goa, Through Its Chief Secr ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
government 8221 cannot be interpreted only by reading the entry 29 as it is once the conceded position in law is industrial development authority vs devendra kumar and ors 2011 9 scc 164 devender kumar tyagi and ors vs state of uttar n rana and ors a i r 1964 s c 648 it is held by the majority view in the said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndira Sawant and Others Vs. Vijayendra Umakant Sheth and Others
Court : Mumbai Goa
54 rajesh and ors vs rajbir singh and ors and 2013 11 scc 517 sharanamma and ors vs managing director divisional judgment reported at 2009 acj 1298 i e 2009 6 scc 121 in case of sarlaverma and others vs delhi transport
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Sai Investments Vs. Bharti Shipyard Limited
Court : Mumbai Goa
of the appellants that by an application dated 24 12 2012 filed under order xv a rule 1 of c p the judgment of the supreme court reported in 1989 2 scc 686 in the case of modern hotel gudur vs k
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Goa, Through the Land Acquisition Officer Pwd (Cell) and Anot ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
..... others vs land acquisition officer hyderabad urban development authority and others 1995 2 scc 305 2 land acquisition officer and mandal revenue officer vs v narasaiah air ..... one of their mundkars it is seen that an area of 648 square metres was sold by the said sale deed which is ..... in his application for enhancement he referred to an area of 648 square metres of land sold to a mundkar at the rate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy. Collector and S.D.O., Mormugao, Vasco-da-gama and Another Vs. Olav ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
4 v m salgaonkar and brother vs union of india 1995 2 scc 302 comparative citation 2013 2 air bom r vs union of india 1995 2 scc 302 comparative citation 2013 2 air bom r 156 singh and ors vs union territory of chandigarh 1992 4 scc 659 3 delhi development authority vs bali ram sharma and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNagu Naik and Others Vs. Swapnesh Prabhu and Others
Court : Mumbai Goa
rendered in new india assurance co ltd vs shanti bai 1995 2 scc 539 and amrit lal sood vs kaushalya devi accident claims tribunal margao in claim petition no 167 of 2008 dated 29th april 2010 by which the claim of the ltd vs prembai patel and ors reported in 2005 6 scc 172 3 new india assurance co ltd vs shanti bai
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSavitribai R. Lotlikar, (Since Deceased), Represented by Lrs: and Othe ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
and others vs land acquisition officer hyderabad and ors 1995 2 scc 305 and ii subh ram and others section 4 1 of the act was published on 4 2 1993 the division bench fixed the market value at rs natesam pillai vs special tahsildar land acquisition tiruchy 2010 9 scc 118 according to him the post notification transactions have been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBetts India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circl ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
impugned notice dated 22 03 2011 the above order dated 29 08 2011 rejects the petitioner s contention that there was by this court in allanasansltd vs dy cit 369 itr 648 that the mere absence of the words failure to disclose
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Mavany Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
Court : Mumbai Goa
e when possession was given which was done in august 1995 itself therefore the transfer of land and the theatre building available at the time when the notice on 13 09 2000 was issued under section 148 of the act this conclusion sushilkumar mehta case sushilkumar mehta v gobindram bohra 1990 1 scc 193 this court has elaborately considered the relevant factual and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahanand Naik Vs. State Through P.P.
Court : Mumbai Goa
came and they searched for her everywhere from 11 09 1995 but she was not found pw3 deposed that his brother by any authority he then deposed that on 26 04 2009 he read a news item on the marathi daily gomantak trimukh maroti kirkan vs state of maharashtra 2006 10 scc 681 the apex court has held that in a case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT