1995 2 Scc 648 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1995 2 scc 648 Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 1 of about 300 results (0.243 seconds)Shivaji S/O Manohar Kale Vs. the Additional Divisional Commissioner an ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
government or a servant of any local authority rule 42 2 m e p s rules section 3 31 of general s union of india amp others reported in 2009 9 scc 648 and in case of biharilal dobray v s roshanlal s the state of maharashtra amp others w p no 6481 of 2007 iv the said act is a complete code
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrakala and Others Vs. Marathwada Medical Research and Rural Devel ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
electricity board thermal power station gujarat v hind mazdoor sabha 1995 5 scc 27 the question raised was whether the workers there is no jurisdiction to try the complaint he observed 20 it was also sought to be contended that mere denial ors v national union waterfront workers and ors 2001 7 scc 1 in several paragraphs particularly paras 65 108 112 113
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKranti Junior Adhyapak and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
record to suggest that the appellant who was appointed in 1995 till 2005 has indulged in any misbehaviour or any other has given much weightage to the letter dated 18 05 2005 seeking assistance of the employees to pay tax of the v k p agrwal and another reported in 2007 2 scc 433 and other judgments of the supreme court including judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRafia Sultana D/O Iqbal Ahemed Khan Vs. Mohd. Osman S/O Mohd. Ismail a ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
in another case of j vasudevan vs t r dhananjaya 1995 6 scc 249 the hon ble supreme court in para salary to the petitioner within six weeks from 12 11 2009 or till today and also the management has been failed 360 in that case the court clearly observed as under scc p 361g the wilful breach of an undertaking given to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Madhavrao S/O Bhujangrao Kinhalkar Vs. Ashok S/O Shankarrao Chavan ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
matter of gajanankrishnaji bapat vs dattaji raghobaji meghe reported in 1995 5 scc 347 in paragraphs 16 and 18 of the of the conduct of election rules 1961 read with form 25 the affidavit is not an affidavit at all in the the matter of kamalnathvs sudesh verma reported in 2002 2 scc 410 wherein it is held thus mere non disclosure
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManikrao S/O. Krishnathrao Salunke Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
about the incident and the crime at cr no 31 1995 came to be registered in omerga police station ambegaonkar produced apex court has observed that the presumption available under section 20 is compulsory presumption section 20 of the pc act shows the case reported as hazarilal vs delhi administration 1980 2 scc 390 the apex court has observed that when there is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Kausalyabai Kisan Chavan Vs. Sakharam Namdeo Gaikwad, Deceased, T ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
the case of vishnu gulabrao sakhare vs kokilabai jagannath patil 1995 supp 4 supreme court cases 567 and hari shankar vs invited my attention to the affidavit of the petitioner dated 28th june 2012 and submitted that the writ petition deserves to gupta and others vs sudesh beharilal and others 1969 1 scc 810 and submitted that the suit by or against the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPremchand Bansi Jadhav and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Ano ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
1984 sc 372 bhagirathsing judeja vs state of gujarat viii 1995 1 scc 349 dolat ram and ors vs state of and speedy trial of the case 16 for respondent no 2 reliance was placed on following reported cases i 2009 8 ors vs state of maharashtra and anr ii 2009 10 scc 652 hazari lal das vs state of west bengal and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhausaheb Pandurang Waghaskar and Others Vs. Gangubai BA; Krishna Laha ...
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
and he also placed reliance on the case reported as 1995 4 scc 718 pt rishikesh v s salma begum the for the appellants placed reliance on the case reported as 2009 dgls soft 1446 r mahalakshmi v s a v anantharaman and another v s chakiri yanadi and another 2011 9 scc 788 shri badrinarayan shankar bhandari and others v s omprakash
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGorakh S/O Bhagwan @ Ganpati Vs. the Sub-divisional Officer and ors.
Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
the tenant it is further contended that on 09 03 1995 the said entry was deleted vide mutation entry no 2154 member maharashtra revenue tribunal aurangabad held that 27 w p 2377 11 sub divisional officer has exceeded its jurisdiction in as dnyanoba lad v dada rama methe reported in 1976 2 scc 236 and submitted that section 32 o of the said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT