1976 Sections 6 - Judgment Search Results

K.A.S. Khader Sahib and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Represented ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1984)1MLJ350

notification. Section 5-A enquiry was held on 18th June, 1973, and the petitioners participated therein. On 10th March, 1976, Section 6(1) declaration was made, and it was then for the first time, the land in question was … taken in this writ petition is that, by issuing an errata beyond the period contemplated under proviso to Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, (I of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the State cannot

R. Abdul Azeez Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-i Overruled

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1981]128ITR547(KAR); [1981]6TAXMAN33(Kar)

the omission of s. 274(2) the IAC was divested of the jurisdiction with effect from April 1, 1976. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act did not save the proceedings as there is no vested right in … Whether the Tribunal was justified in coming to the conclusion that the order of penalty dated September 22, 1976, was not barred by limitation ?3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the

Delhi Administration Vs. Munshi Ram Ram Niwas and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1985CriLJ1230; ILR1984Delhi588

scope, effect and purpose of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976.(2) M/S. Munshi Ram Ram Niwas through its sole proprietor Shri Ram Niwas, respondent No. 1 was carrying on … and constant attention of the Government. There had been widespread public criticism of the manner in which some sections of the trade and middlemen were able to get round, and render ineffective, legal and administrative measures devised … conferred under Section 3 of the E.G. Act. A notice under Section 6-A of the E.C. Act was issued to respondent No. 1 alleging a

Srinivasa Vakil and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1980Kant44; ILR1980KAR638

Karnataka Ordinances Nos. 20 and 29 of 1976. This Act received the assent of the Governor on 27-11-1976. Section 6 of the Amendment Act incorporated Section 21A into the principal Act with effect from 13-10-1976. Section 21A … time to time and we are concerned in these petitions with the Karnataka Rent Control (Second Amendment) Act, 1976 (Karnataka Act No. 66 of 1976), in, short ('the Amendment Act') which replaced Karnataka Ordinances Nos. 20 and

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Manishkumar S/O Babulal Biyani

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998BomCR(Cri)452; (1998)1BOMLR760; 1998CriLJ303; 1998(1)MhLj431

of the said Act and has laid down the above-stated ratio. However, by the Act No. 92 of 1976, section 6-E of the Essential Commodities Act was added and introduced in the Statute Book. That was also … which were seized by the police on 1st October, 1996 in Crime No. 290 of 1996 registered under sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant is a dealer of Handi Gas. However, those

K.A.S. Khader Sahib and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1983Mad383

Erode taluk, which is involved in this writ petition, was not notified as part of the said notification. Section 5-A enquiry was held on 18-6-1973 and the petitioners participated therein. On 10-3-1976, Section 6(1) declaration was made,

Bhima Vs. Taluka Executive Magistrate

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1993KAR1504; 1993(2)KarLJ47

was delivered to Shankar. Subsequently, Bhima filed an application under the provisions of the Karnataka Debtors Relief Act, 1976 seeking relief from indebtedness, proceeding being numbered as KDR/HKP. 445 dated 25.11.1976, the Taluka Magistrate passed the order, … and the mortgage having been redeemed. 2. Sale of an extent of 6 acres 29 guntas of land situate in Kangala village by Bhima in … application dated 24.7.85 filed by Bhima being that it was filed beyond the prescribed period under the Act.2. Section 5 of the Karnataka Debt Relief (Amendment) 1981 as amended by Act 17/81 reads. Section 5(1):-'A debtor referred

V.G. Naidu @ Govindasamy Naidu Vs. Pahlajraj Gangaram @ Pahlaj Rai

Court: Chennai

For example, the decision on applicability of constructive res judicata for execution proceeding is not necessary after the 1976 amendment to section 11 C.P.C., incorporating explanation VII to Section 11 C.P.C. The said explanation VII reads as … delivery, a criminal prosecution was launched in C.C.No.2273 of 1981 by the erstwhile landlord. The complaint was under Sections 448 and 451 of Indian Penal Code. That complaint was dismissed on 08.02.1983. 6.2. Later, a Writ of

Abdul Aziz Alisaheb Bharmar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra,addi ...

Court: Mumbai

the relief claimed by the petitioners in prayer clause (b), it is necessary to consider the Scheme of Sections 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the the Act of 1976. Section 6 required persons holding vacant land in

Sanat Kumar Vs. Parke Davis (India) Ltd.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ476MP

is not a 'workman' and secondly he will be governed by Sates Promotion Employees (Condition of Service) Act, 1976 and as a Medical Representative he does not come within the perview of workman.6. We have heard rival … the case back to respondent No. 2 i.e., State Government for decision on the point of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, before referring the matter for adjudication to the lower Court.3. The brief