1974 Sections 3 1 - Judgment Search Results

Maharaja Fatehsinhrao Zoo Trust Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1999Guj346; (1999)3GLR2361

was held that by virtue of the amendment Act of 1972 which came into force from May 2nd, 1974, Section 3(1)(d) of the Ceiling Act as it stood on 1968 was repealed and no exemption was any … reason to extend interim relief any more. The request, therefore, cannot be accepted. Property - surplus land - Sections 21, 29 and 29B of Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1961, Section 4 of Gujarat Private Forest (Acquisition)

Gulab Impex Enterprises Ltd. Vs. International Airport Authority of In ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 46(1992)DLT515; 1994(74)ELT37(Del)

Criminal Writ No. 4-32 of 1991-Decided on 17-2-92 Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974- Section 3(1)- Detention order under- Constitution of India-Art. 226 -Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging said detention order-On the … Writ No. 4-32 of 1991-Decided on 17-2-92 Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974- Section 3(1)- Detention order under- Constitution of India-Art. 226 -Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging said detention order-On the ground

Pawan Bajaj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003IIIAD(Delhi)192; 104(2003)DLT407; 2003(68)DRJ273; 2003(2)JCC648

no merit in this petition, which is dismissed. Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 Section 3(1)--Preventive detention--Representation of detenu--Delay in disposal of--Delay in the disposal of detenu's representations will not invalidate unless … observed while ordering such detention. Article 22(5) of the Constitution embodies these safeguards and guarantees and so do Sections 3(3), 8 & 9 of the COFEPOSA casting an obligation on the Detaining Authority to communicate the grounds

Nithyakalyani Vs. Mahendra Prasad and Another

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1991CriLJ2685; 1991(34)ECC190

of such documents does not vitiate detention--Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (52 of 1974), Section 3(1).;COFEPOSA - Detention--Unexplained long delay in considering detenu's representation--Vitiates detention--Continued detention illegal--Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention … of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act. The detention order was passed under section 3(1) of the said Act with a view to preventing the detenu from dealing in smuggled goods otherwise

Abdul Nasir Khan Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1991)93BOMLR298; 1991CriLJ507

exercise of powers under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The order of detention is at Exh. A. Grounds of detention were … of the detention order dated April 24, 1990 issued by the first respondent in exercise of powers under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as

Ferdousi Rahman Vs. Union of India and anr

Court: Delhi

Mosarraf Hossain (detenue) under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as „the COFEPOSA Act) by virtue of a detention order No. F 678/12/2010 - CUS/VIII … writ petition has been filed in respect of the detention of the petitioners husband Mosarraf Hossain (detenue) under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as

Alex C Joseph, Pathanamthitta District Vs. the Union of India, Rep. by ...

Court: Kerala

1. An order of detention dated 13/4/2000 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as … dated 13/4/2000 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) issued against the petitioner is challenged. A writ of certiorari is sought.

Rajesh Verma and Another Vs. Uoi and Another

Court: Delhi

1. The Petitioners seek quashing of a detention order dated 07.10.2004 issued by the second respondent under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter  referred to as … the second respondent under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter  referred to as the "COFEPOSA Act"). The detention order has not been served on the subject, i.e.

Dr. Hannan Gulam HussaIn Chaugule Vs. State of Goa and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(2)BomCR303; (1989)91BOMLR669; 1990CriLJ1550

of the powers under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 the State Government directed Shri Gulam Hussain Chaugule, alias, Gulam Hussain Shaikh alias Baba to be detained at … the Order bearing No. 14/11/88-HD(G) dated 3rd November, 1988 purportedly made in the exercise of the powers under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 the State Government directed

Prabhakar Mahadeo Pokale Vs. State of Goa and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(2)BomCR107; (1989)91BOMLR124; 1990CriLJ1610

leave is rejected.(25) Petition dismissed. Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (Act LII of 1974), Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(1)(i), 5-A - Translation of grounds of detention and documents from English into language known to detenu--Variation