1973 Sections 340 - Judgment Search Results
Sh. Puneet Anand Vs. Lt. Governor, Govt. of Nct Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2004
Reported in: 110(2004)DLT444; 2004(73)DRJ630
into the alleged offence, affecting administration of justice.The application has no merit and is dismissed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 340--Allegation of making false averments and producing forged documents in legal proceedings--Respondent giving plausible Explanationn for … respondents deliberately forged the documents at Annexure A by giving a wrong heading showing it to be under Section 21(2). He submits that the resolution was not under Section 21(2) of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and
Asha Sunder Shivdasani Vs. V. Aruna Ramesh Kriplani
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-13-2000
Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)592; 2001CriLJ2146
admitted fact that Justice Nijjar set aside the grant of probate.11. Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code which was relied upon by Mr. Bhandary … authorities in support of his contentions viz. 1) (Cal) (Mayapur Sree Chaitanya Math v. Sachidananda Brahmachari); 2) : 1973CriLJ1176 (Santokh Singh v. Izhar Hussain and 3) .8. On the other hand, advocate for Ms. Asha Shivdasani contended … and directions as may be deemed fit and the possible action would be to lodge the complaint under Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code through the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.6. When this matter
S. H. Taralagatti Vs. Director General, All India Radio
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: 1995(1)ALT(Cri)328; ILR1994KAR3478; 1995(1)KarLJ75
In the result, for the foregoing reasons, the Petition fails and is dismissed. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - Sections 340 & 195 - Scope & Ambit : supplementary to each other & to be read together -Section 195
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hridayangshu Bhattacharjee Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2002
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1831; 2003CriLJ624
in this application, which is allowed. The order dated 13-2-2001 is, hereby, quashed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 340 and 195(3)--Enquiry by Court--As a preliminary enquiry--Statutory requirement to afford an opportunity of hearing to accused, against whom
Shri Rajiv Lochan Vs. Shri Narender Nath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2003
Reported in: 2003VIAD(Delhi)152; AIR2004Delhi48; 106(2003)DLT427; 2003(70)DRJ649
in pecuniary jurisdiction of courts--Civil Judge competent to review the order passed by Additional District Judge--Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340--Punjab Courts Act, 1918, Sections 21, 25, 26.;The notifications issued by this Court in exercise of its
Gheesu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-02-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ4119; 1998(1)WLN555
order before the learned Hon'ble Chief Justice for suitable orders. Penal Code, 1860 - Section 212--Criminal Procedure Code, 1973--Sections 340(1)(c) and 352 and Rajasthan Police Rule--Form No. 96--Police submitted a negative final report besides a printed form
Sunit Kumar Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-18-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)WLC299; 1998(1)WLN546
with law after giving the parties to the case a fair opportunity of being heard. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 340--Summoning document or any thing--Procedure for taking action where a false prosecution was launched--The accused was
A.D. Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-1982
Reported in: 23(1983)DLT3
has already undertaken and to reach independent conclusions separately. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 340--Whether strictures against a prosecution witness, not examined at the trial, against whom enquiry under Section … Food Inspector R. K. Mann, Dr. A. D. Kumar and J.K. Jain and others, to be instituted under section 340 Cr. P.C. Certain strictures against the conduct of Dr. A. D. Kumar, Health Officer were also passed.
Manohar Lal Arora Vs. Sunila Agarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-1996
Reported in: 1996IIIAD(Delhi)782; II(1996)BC610; 63(1996)DLT658; 1996(38)DRJ434; (1996)114PLR51
No-4205/95 is filed by the plaintiff purporting to be under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is stated in the application that the defendants have filed eight documents as the best evidence available … of the plaintiff. thereforee, ad interim injunction granted on 19.01.1995 is made absolute. (5) is No. 9987/95 under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code is filed on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has filed this application for
Mahant Surinder Nath Thru His Attorney Shri Satish Kumar Vs. Union of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2007
Reported in: 146(2008)DLT438; 2008(100)DRJ195
must be initiated against the plaintiff and his attorney under Section 340(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr.P.C.). It is further prayed that an FIR should be registered not only … in evidence.(1) No court shall take cognizance-. (b) (i) Of any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive), 199, 200, 205
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free