1973 Sections 313 - Judgment Search Results

Chandregowda Vs. State by Hoskote Police

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999(1)ALD(Cri)266; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)462; 1999(1)KarLJ65

Acts/Rules/Orders:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 313 and 342;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 31, 45 and 46;Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 300 and 302Cases

Rajesh Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

an imaginary trivial or merely a probable doubt based on reason and common sense. C. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313 ­Examination of accused­Meant to meet requirements of 11 two principles of natural justice i.e audi alterum … 330 of 2002 dated 10.10.2002 was instituted for the offence under section 364 of the I.P.C and subsequently, Sections 302/201 were added by the order of learned C.J.M dated 13.10.2002.9. After investigation, police submitted charge­sheet and the

Rev. Mother Marykutty. Vs. Reni C. Kottaram and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 8, 9 138, 142, 118, 139; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 313, 255(1), 357(1) -- The appellant/accused is aggrieved by the judgment dated 17.03.2010 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1707/2007 of

Gita Ram and anr. Vs. State of H.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292, 34, 293; Cinematograph Act - Section 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313;  Probation of Offenders Act - Section 4 -- After the statements of the appellants were

Sunder @ Sundararajan. Vs. State by Inspector of Police.

Court: Supreme Court of India

had been recorded, the statements of the accused were recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Despite having been afforded an opportunity, … should be proved as was held by this Court in Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra : 1973CriLJ1783 where the following observations were made:Certainly, it is a primary principle that the accused must be and not … of Maheshwari (PW1) to him. Consequent upon the gathering of the above information, the accused were charged under Sections 364-A (for kidnapping for ransom), 302 (murder) and 201 (for having caused disappearance of evidence) of the Indian

Attar Singh. Vs. State of MaharashtrA.

Court: Supreme Court of India

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 498-A; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313 -- Punishment for murder --  The village Kotwal enquired about the incident and questioned the

Kukapalli Mohan Rao. Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

appeal, therefore, lacks in merits and accordingly dismissed. [K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra, JJ.] Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313; India Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302 -- Power to examine the accused --  PWs … to 4 were marked. On conclusion of the examination of the prosecution witnesses, the accused was examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and he denied all incriminating materials appeared against him in the prosecution evidence.5. Learned Sessions Judge,

Ram Singh. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Penal Code, (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 323; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 313 -- Two witnesses were examined by the defence including the accused Ghasilal. The High Court,

Gudu Ram. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh.

Court: Supreme Court of India

of on the above terms. [SWATANTER KUMAR; MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.] Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 313, 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 304 -- To prevent the scuffle from escalating, Jai Pal

Prem Parkash at Lillu and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

appreciation of evidence. We see no reason to interfere. [B.S. Chauhan; Swatanter Kumar JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 313 -- Dissatisfied with the judgment of the trial court, the accused preferred an appeal before the … Dharambir @ Pappu, Prem Prakash @ Lillu and Herchand @ Poley, were charged for an offence punishable under Sections 366 and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Upon trial, the learned Additional