Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

1973 Section 156 3 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 09 1971

Balakrushna SwaIn Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-09-1971

Reported in: AIR1971SC804; 1971CriLJ670; (1971)3SCC192

allow the Appeal, set aside the conviction and direct the accused to be released. Criminal - murder - Section 156 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 148, 302 and 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 145 … P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. The Appellant Balakrushna Swain was convicted of an offence of murder under Section 302 and awarded death sentence by the Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack, subject to confirmation by the High Court. He


May 03 2007

RubabbuddIn Sheikh Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-03-2007

Reported in: (2007)2GLR1826; 2007(6)SCALE365; (2007)4SCC318; 2007AIRSCW3473; 2007CrLJ3206(1)

final status report within two weeks from date of Order. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.[C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 156: [Tarun Chatterjee & P.K. Balasubramanyan, JJ] Investigation by C.B.I., - Fake encounters by Police Direction for investigation by … in which Tulsiram was arrested.3. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the writ petitioner, by filing the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for a direction to the Gujarat police to produce Kausarbi and


Aug 06 2007

Silak Ram and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-06-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC2739; 2007CriLJ3760; JT2007(9)SC641; 2007(9)SCALE606; (2007)10SCC464; 2007AIRSCW4944; 2007CrLJ3760(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2470; (2007)3Crimes326(SC)

held by Trial Court and High Court - Appeal dismissed - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.[C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 156: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & D.K. Jain, JJ] F.I.R. Delay in recording Murder taking place at mid night Police … appeal filed by the accused-appellants. Three accused persons faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') for causing homicidal death


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 16 2006

Hari Singh Vs. the State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jun-16-2006

Reported in: AIR2006SC2464; 2006CriLJ3283; 130(2006)DLT591; 2006(3)KLT269; RLW2006(4)SC2731; 2006(6)SCALE489; (2006)5SCC733

taken on the First Information Report lodged by the petitioner.2. Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code') relates to ' Information to the Police and their Powers to Investigate'. Section 154 … have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence.3. Section 156 deals with 'Police officer's power to investigate cognizable cases' and the same reads as follows:(1) Any officer in


Dec 06 2006

Om Prakash and ors. Vs. Shiv Kumar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-06-2006

Reported in: 2007(2)ALT38(SC); 2007(1)AWC466(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN26; [2007(3)JCR154(SC)]; 2006(13)SCALE657

the details. Absence of name of co-accused in the F.I.R. is not fatal to the prosecution case. -- Section 156: Defective Investigation Held, It does not lead total rejection of prosecution case. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 [C.A. No. … any suspicious circumstances, but defendant-appellants have failed to do so - Appeal dismissed - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.[C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 154: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] F.I.R. Failure to name the co-accused Eye witness/informant … 29.6.1997, was a valid Will which was registered before the Sub-Registrar on 30.6.1967. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court reversed


Dec 06 2006

Rotash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-06-2006

Reported in: 2007CriLJ758; 2006(13)SCALE186; 2007AIRSCW44; (2007)2SCC(Cri)382; (2007)1Crimes236(SC); 2007(2)KCCRSN57; 2007(2)AIRKarR22(SC)

the deceased, although named Appellant in her statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 before the Investigating Officer, she did not attribute any overt act on his part. (iii) Presence of P.Ws. … the details. Absence of name of co-accused in the F.I.R. is not fatal to the prosecution case. -- Section 156: Defective Investigation Held, It does not lead total rejection of prosecution case. INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 [C.A. No. … was said to be that Moosaram allegedly used to harass his wife. 3. While Appellant along with the said Pitram was convicted for commission of


Jun 04 2007

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Nisar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jun-04-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC2316; RLW2007(4)SC3181; 2007(8)SCALE446; (2007)5SCC658; 2007AIRSCW4015; (2007)3SCC(Cri)5; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)2010; 2007(3)KCCRSN174.

interfere with the decision of High Court - Appeal dismissed. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973.[C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 156: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & D.K. Jain, JJ] Extra judicial confession made much before FIR was lodged Held, Non-mention … ST. No. 44 of 1988 and directed acquittal of the respondent. Accused faced trial for offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'Code').2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:The case,


Aug 28 1996

M/S. J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-28-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIAD(SC)152; AIR1996SC3527; 1997(57)ECC49; 1996(86)ELT472(SC); JT1996(7)SC674; 1996(6)SCALE299; (1996)6SCC92; [1996]Supp5SCR295

and disposed of on merits.10. There shall be no order as to costs. Excise - ex-parte Order - Section 156 of Customs Act, 1962, Rules 20, 21 and 41 of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) … before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT). The appeal was on board for hearing on 31st August, 1987. When the appeal reached hearing, the appellant (before us) was not represented. CEGAT heard the departmental


Aug 06 1991

Kalyan Kumar Ray Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal-iv, Calcu ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-06-1991

Reported in: AIR1992SC159; (1992)102CTR(SC)188; [1991]191ITR634(SC); 1992Supp(2)SCC424

complied with and that the assessment order was not, in any manner, vitiated. Direct Taxation - notice - Section 156 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - matter related to validity of demand notice issued under Section 156 - … Ganguly,JJ] Benefit of Act to pending cases - Appeal against conviction for offence punishable under Sections 147,148 & 302 r/w Section 149 I.P.C. - Appellant had not completed 18 years of age on date of occurrence and


Jun 08 2010

Padmalakshmi Ammal ... Vs. the State of Tamilnadu, and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-08-2010

154 deals with information in cognizable cases, Section 155 pertains to non-cognizable cases and investigation of such cases, Section 156 empowers the police officers to investigate cognizable offences and Section 157 envisages procedure for investigation. Under Section 156, … the petitioner on receipt of the compensation amount paid in respect thereof.2. The writ petition was admitted on 31.12.2003 and notice was ordered to the respondents. On behalf of the second respondent, a counter affidavit dated 08.11.2008


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial