1972 Sections 1 3 - Judgment Search Results

Principal, Krishi Vidyalaya Vs. Dwarkabai Haribhau Hingane

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2008(119)FLR608]; (2009)ILLJ488Bom; 2008(6)MhLj576

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 has no application to an educational institution in view of the provisions of Section 1 Sub-section (3) of the Payment of Gratuity Act. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the provisions … Act. The respondent who was employed with the petitioner had claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short, 'the Act'). The application was allowed by the Controlling Authority under the Act. An appeal was

Indian Red Cross Society, Orissa State, Rep. Throu Vs. Bankanidhi Mish ...

Court: Orissa

the order for onward disbursement to the applicant as per Section 7(3) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for short, “Act, 1972”.) and also the execution proceeding initiated under Annexure-3 dated 30.12.2011.2. Petitioner’s case in a … not an establishment/establishments as notified by the Central Government under Section 1(3)(c) of the Act, 1972. Referring to Sections 2(8) and 2(19) of the Orissa Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1956, it was submitted that “establishment”. means

Nalazala Srinivas Rao Vs. S. Lokeswara Rao

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(4)ALD672

action for the suit arose within the scheduled area, by reason of non-application of A.P. Civil Courts Act, 1972 (Section 1(3) thereof), a civil Court constituted for non-tribal area cannot even entertain a suit. That is not

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Smt. V.T. Naresh and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1985(9)DRJ173; (1986)ILLJ323Del

points again. Before noticing the submissions made before me, certain relevant provisions of the Act may be seen. Section 1 of the Act provides for applicability of the Act. Relevant part of Sub-s. (3) of S. 1 … Corporation of Delhi has impugned the order of the Controlling Authority appointed under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 which transpires in to be an order dated 22nd December, 1980 as stated in the appeal filed before

Municipal Board Vs. Controlling Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Ac ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)723

Section 10 of the Act, 1972 was filed by the respondent No. 3 before respondent No. 1 on the ground that Poonam Chand was entitled … (Ex.5) of the Labour Commissioner and the Appellate Authority Under Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (here in after referred to as the Act). One Poonam Chand was appointed as Octroi Guard in the … has challenged the order dated 29th Sept., 1984 (Ex.5) of the Labour Commissioner and the Appellate Authority Under Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (here in after referred to as the Act). One Poonam … Petitioner by this writ petition has challenged the order dated 29th Sept., 1984 (Ex.5) of the Labour Commissioner and the Appellate Authority Under Section 7

Narra Koteswara Rao Vs. Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(1)ALD66; 2000(6)ALT320; [2002(94)FLR698]; (2001)ILLJ685AP

Government, would be only the Central Government and consequently, respondents 2 and 3 appointed by the State Government did not have jurisdiction to deal with … first respondent by declaring as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.2. The petitioner who worked as Manager (Administration) of the third respondent company moved the second respondent for payment … by the State against the petitioner in the Court of IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada for offences punishable under Sections 408, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and the same is pending for trial. He further stated that both … records and quash the order dated 28-2-2000 made in PGA No.5 of 1999 on the file of the first respondent by declaring as illegal arbitrary

Jagriti Vs. the State and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1994AP225; 1994(1)ALT376

on and from 1st November, 1969 the provisions of the A. P.(Andhra Area) Prohibition Act, 1937, other than Sections 1, 3 and 6 shall cease to be in force in all local areas of Andhra Pradesh, not comprising the … to excessive delegation rendering the enactment a nullity.14. In M/s. Sitaram Bishambhar Dayal v. State of U.P., AIR 1972 SC 1168 the question which came up for consideration was whether the power delegated by the Legislature to

Chettian Veetil Ammad and anr. Vs. Taluk Land Board and ors. Overruled

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1573; (1980)1SCC499; [1979]3SCR839

The parties are left to pay and bear their own costs. (i) Property - date of enforcement - Sections 1 (3), 2 (5), 2 (14), 2 (36-A), 72-K (1), 72-K (2), 81 (1), 82, 84, 85 (5), 85 (9), … material particulars, by Act 35 of 1969, and then by Act 25 of 1971 and Act 17 of 1972. There were other amendments also, but it is agreed that they do not bear on the controversy before

Mr. Venkateshwara Rao and Six ors. Vs. the Sub-judge, Khammam and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(3)LS78

and void and without jurisdiction. No costs. Property - acquisition - Section 3 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 1 (3), 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 12 (1), 13, 14, 15, 15 (1), 16, 17 (3), 18, … the same and the decrees passed by the courts are nullity as the Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972 is not applicable to the scheduled areas. It is further submitted that even if the Civil Courts have

Poona Cantonment Board Vs. S.K. Das and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(2)BomCR51; (1993)95BOMLR541; (1993)IILLJ487Bom

set up by the Central Government to hear appeals under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 (hereinafter, for short, called 'the Act'), who has passed the impugned order. The other respondents are the workmen … Appellate Authority set up by the Central Government to hear appeals under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 (hereinafter, for short, called … petitioner-Board, as the offices/establishments where the concerned workmen were employed do not fall within the ambit of Section 1(3)(b) so as to make the Act applicable. It is common ground that, at the relevant time, no notification